1974
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)95852-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical study of the application of graphite-furnace non-flame atomic absorption spectrometry to the deter-mination of trace base metals in complex heavy-matrix sample solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous reviews and critical studies have appeared on the use of the graphite furnace for nonflame atomization ( 4 , 45) and the technique is enjoying ever wider use. The furnace is being used for direct atomization of rock samples for the determination of numerous elements (E-26-E-28), for the determination of antimony in steel ( 6 7 ) , determination of trace elements in high purity glasses and their raw materials (71), combined with electrodeposition for the determination of a number of elements in salt solutions (96,201), and numerous other applications.…”
Section: Titrimetric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous reviews and critical studies have appeared on the use of the graphite furnace for nonflame atomization ( 4 , 45) and the technique is enjoying ever wider use. The furnace is being used for direct atomization of rock samples for the determination of numerous elements (E-26-E-28), for the determination of antimony in steel ( 6 7 ) , determination of trace elements in high purity glasses and their raw materials (71), combined with electrodeposition for the determination of a number of elements in salt solutions (96,201), and numerous other applications.…”
Section: Titrimetric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous interelement interferences, both positive and negative, exist for graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy for various trace metals and have been documented in Cruz and van Loon (1974), Johnson and Maxwell (1981), Pinta (1982), andvan Loon (1985). Interferences are eliminated or compensated for through the removal of silica by the digestion procedure, dilution, the use of mixed salt standards, the use of deuterium source background correction (where applicable and appropriate), the choice of appropriate ashing and atomization temperatures and times, and the use of matrix modifiers (where applicable).…”
Section: Interferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interelement interferences, both positive and negative, are removed or compensated for. Further information about the principles of the method can be found in Cruz and van Loon (1974), Johnson and Maxwell (1981), Pinta (1982), andvan Loon (1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…doi:10.1016/j.sab.2004.11.001 [7][8][9], formation of a volatile compound between analyte and matrix before the atomization step and its loss by vaporization in molecular form at the beginning of atomization step or during the pyrolysis step, depending on the temperature [10][11][12][13][14]; expulsion of analyte atoms together with rapidly expanding matrix gases in the atomization step [9][10][11]15]; formation of a thermally stable compound of analyte upon its reaction with matrix constituents, which is not efficiently atomized compared to matrix-free analyte [5,10,12,13]. All those processes generally cause depressive effects on the analyte sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%