2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review of process parameters influencing the fate of antibiotic resistance genes in the anaerobic digestion of organic waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was achieved at optimum conditions of pH (6) and OLR (2 kgCODm −3 ·days −1 ), and an antibiotic concentration of 75%. The result obtained is in agreement with Conde-Cid et al [ 23 ], Rodríguez-López et al [ 12 ], and Haffiez et al [ 5 ] who reported pH as one of the most important parameters for maximizing the efficiency of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Thus pH affects the biodegradation process via the rate of the chemical reactions and generation of radicals in the process [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was achieved at optimum conditions of pH (6) and OLR (2 kgCODm −3 ·days −1 ), and an antibiotic concentration of 75%. The result obtained is in agreement with Conde-Cid et al [ 23 ], Rodríguez-López et al [ 12 ], and Haffiez et al [ 5 ] who reported pH as one of the most important parameters for maximizing the efficiency of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Thus pH affects the biodegradation process via the rate of the chemical reactions and generation of radicals in the process [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The result obtained is in agreement with Conde-Cid et al [ 23 ], Rodríguez-López et al [ 12 ], and Haffiez et al [ 5 ] who reported pH as one of the most important parameters for maximizing the efficiency of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Thus pH affects the biodegradation process via the rate of the chemical reactions and generation of radicals in the process [ 5 ]. A confirmatory experiment was carried out under the optimum conditions and a desirability performance of 85% removal of the contaminant was achieved.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other factors that may contribute to ARGs propagation include the presence of heavy metals, exposure to MPs/NPs, and the use of conductive additives. 18 In this study, the targeted ARGs including tetW, tetA, tetB, tetM, sul1, sul2, bla TEM , ermB, and MGEs (intl1 and intl2) were detected in the digestate (Figure 4a−d). Among all ARGs, sul1 (14−48%) and intl1 (17−43%), followed by tetW (14−26%), were the most abundant in all samples.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…1 Thereby, exposure to NPs can intensify the selective pressure for ARGs proliferation. 18 For instance, Shi et al found that exposure to NPs increased the prevalence of those bacteria, which were potential ARG hosts. 43 Further, the increased ROS production after exposure to NPs could damage the bacterial cell and increase their membrane permeability, potentially causing more bacteria to become ARG receptors via the intrabacterial community transfer of MGEs.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%