2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review of cell culture strategies for modelling intracortical brain implant material reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 217 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A primary mixed astrocyte and microglia culture from rodent cortex was used to assess material impacts on cell growth and development. These cell types were chosen as they are the most likely cell types to be in contact with these materials when applied to cortical electrode arrays as the neurons are usually displaced from the device interface . Figure shows the resulting cell coverage for both materials (Figure A) and the comparison cell morphologies observed within the culture (Figure B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primary mixed astrocyte and microglia culture from rodent cortex was used to assess material impacts on cell growth and development. These cell types were chosen as they are the most likely cell types to be in contact with these materials when applied to cortical electrode arrays as the neurons are usually displaced from the device interface . Figure shows the resulting cell coverage for both materials (Figure A) and the comparison cell morphologies observed within the culture (Figure B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This progression of modulus loss over time is well aligned with the implant and neural recovery period. [3,4] It is known that an implant requires a modulus higher than that of the neural tissue to facilitate an accurate and low damage insertion; however, the ongoing presence of stiff materials will impart a frustrated immune response and hence generate scar tissue. [3] It should be noted that the living electrode construct is not designed to be implanted on the day it is fabricated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] The consequences of this mode of operation is that chronic frustration of the wound-healing process produces a scar tissue reaction, which encapsulates the implant and electrically isolates it from the target tissue. [3,4] As a result, the amount of charge required to activate the target tissue often increases over time and the implant loses efficacy. [5,6] Rather than relying on unwieldy metal electrodes and direct charge injection, tissue-engineered bioelectronics will use cells embedded within devices to provide a natural mode of physiologic tissue activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] MEAs provide a noninvasive way to record changes in the extracellular field generated by cells cultured on the device. The field potentials are caused by ionic current flow within the cell culture Overall, a total recording yield of 21.4% is achieved, with more than 90% obtained from electrodes with neurospheres, maximizing the functionality of these planar MEAs as effective tools to study pharmacology-based effects on neural networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Since then, this in vitro method has been widely explored, and a diverse catalogue of MEAs has been developed for different applications. [2,4,5] Essential for in vitro recording are: (1) an accurate and sensitive recording system and (2) an electrically active neural network. To this end, various device designs and neural cell culture optimizations have been explored to improve the success of microelectrode studies, as briefly described below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%