“…It also highlights how the lawful dynamics defining rhythmic
coordination are largely indifferent to the physical or biophysical properties of the
movements involved, as well as the manner of coupling—the coupling can be
physical or informational (visually or auditory). Particularly relevant for the current
study is recent research demonstrating how similar low-dimensional dynamical processes
define a myriad of periodic or semi-periodic multiagent coordination tasks, including
interpersonal object movement and collision avoidance tasks (e.g., Mörtl, Lorenz, & Hirche, 2014; Richardson, et al, 2015), competitive sports tasks (e.g.,
McGarry et al, 2002; Okumura et al, 2012; Yokoyama & Yamamoto, 2012), and
improvised social movement tasks (e.g., Zhai, et al,
2014). …”