2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical evaluation of bond strength tests for the assessment of bonding to Y-TZP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(94 reference statements)
2
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Each method, in which different calculation is used to determine bond strength value, has inherent advantages and shortcomings 323334. Higher strength values are generally found with shear bond strength test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each method, in which different calculation is used to determine bond strength value, has inherent advantages and shortcomings 323334. Higher strength values are generally found with shear bond strength test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,[21][22][23][24][25] Bond strength is measured using various methods each using macro-or microspecimens: shear tests, tensile tests, or push-out tests. [26][27][28] The bond strength of resin cements to zirconia varies significantly according to the test design. 26,28 The variability in results among these testing methods makes it difficult to establish a correlation between laboratory data and the clinical performance of tested materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28] The bond strength of resin cements to zirconia varies significantly according to the test design. 26,28 The variability in results among these testing methods makes it difficult to establish a correlation between laboratory data and the clinical performance of tested materials. [29][30][31][32] A more clinically related method of testing the retention capability of dental cement is the crown retention test design, where crowns are cemented under a defined load and pulled off in an axial direction after the cement has set.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,138 Recently many authors have advocated microtensile bond strength testing (MTBS) where the load is applied perpendicular to the bonded interface and the specimen size is small. 78,84,102,123,131,132,139 However, the MTBS test is a tedious and meticulous method which requires time and effort, especially during preparing and sectioning of the specimens, to avoid damaging the microbars. 39,61,133 Furthermore, bond strength test findings should be combined with chemical analysis, 117 fractographic analysis [134][135][136][137] and cyclic loading.…”
Section: Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%