2002
DOI: 10.1299/jsmeintmovic.6.2.1151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Comparison of Time Domain Load Identification Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Force identification problems were initially solved off-line in a deterministic setting. Many methods were proposed, most of them based on the inversion of the frequency response function [1,2,3] or making use of a time domain approach [4,5,6,7]. Several state estimation algorithms have been proposed for linear as well as for non-linear systems [8,9,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Force identification problems were initially solved off-line in a deterministic setting. Many methods were proposed, most of them based on the inversion of the frequency response function [1,2,3] or making use of a time domain approach [4,5,6,7]. Several state estimation algorithms have been proposed for linear as well as for non-linear systems [8,9,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7)- (9) it is implied that the state variables are discretized using N s nodes in time whereas the load is discretized using N p time-nodes. We point out that the time partitioning related to ϕ n and φ m are formally independent and do not need to be uniform.…”
Section: Finite Element Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Force or load identification problems have been studied extensively in literatures, e.g. [2,6,9,13,15,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many force identification algorithms have been proposed in the literature [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. These methods can be distinguished by the way they tackle the ill-posedness of the force identification problem [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%