2013
DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2013.759433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Assessment of Charismatic—Transformational Leadership Research: Back to the Drawing Board?

Abstract: There is a widely shared consensus that charismatic -transformational leadership is a particularly effective form of leadership. In a critical assessment of the state-of-the-science in this area of research, we question the validity of that conclusion. We identify four problems with theory and research in charismatic-transformational leadership. First, a clear conceptual definition of charismatic -transformational leadership is lacking. Current theories advance multi-dimensional conceptualizations of charismat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
329
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 474 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
12
329
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This alternative would be particularly problematic if charisma was an individual trait rather than attribution made by others. A recent review of charismatic leadership argues that the concept lacks some conceptual clarity and is only infrequently operationalized independent of its effects on others (Van Knippenberg & Sitkin, 2013). This conclusion seems to strengthen the notion that the perception of charisma on the part of observers is primarily a function of the leader's presentation of a vision and use of language (Fanelli, Misangyi, & Tosi, 2009;Galvin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This alternative would be particularly problematic if charisma was an individual trait rather than attribution made by others. A recent review of charismatic leadership argues that the concept lacks some conceptual clarity and is only infrequently operationalized independent of its effects on others (Van Knippenberg & Sitkin, 2013). This conclusion seems to strengthen the notion that the perception of charisma on the part of observers is primarily a function of the leader's presentation of a vision and use of language (Fanelli, Misangyi, & Tosi, 2009;Galvin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This role can be facilitated by the leader's ability to set positive but realistic goals, and communicate these goals in a manner that is understandable, precise and reflects a collective sense of purpose (Avolio & Bass, 1995;Van Knippenberg & Sitkin, 2013). As shown in Table 2 employees' jobs so that employees are empowered to apply their creative knowledge rather than being narrowly constrained in terms of what they are able do in their jobs (Kalmi & Kauhanen, 2008).…”
Section: Mapping Transformational Leadership Onto Hpwpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformational leadership is characterized by four main dimensions (Bass, 1991;Bass & Riggio, 2006;Van Knippenberg & Sitkin, 2013;Nielsen et al, 2008). The first, 'idealized influence' connotes the leader's ability to act as a role model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, transformational leadership theory has been critiqued for its limitations (i.e., its definition is not clear and is conflated with its effects; the lack of understanding of the specific role of the different dimensions and how each dimension has a distinct influence on mediating processes and outcomes; and the validity of the measurement tools) (van Knippenberg & Sitkin, 2013). Furthermore, recent empirical research suggests that transformational leadership and other leadership styles constructs should include not only interpersonal and motivational dimensions, but also instrumental dimensions linked to environmental scanning and strategy formulation (e.g., Antonakis & House, 2004).…”
Section: Transformational Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%