2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.402100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Analysis of Critical Loss Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, as is now familiar, the way to predict the price elevation resulting from the merger is to determine the diversion ratio between the firms' products (suppose, for simplicity, that each sells only one) and use the levels of the premerger markups for each to determine how much price will rise. These ideas are long familiar from critical loss analysis-e.g., Baker and Bresnahan (1985), Harris and Simons (1989), O'Brien and Wickelgren (2003)-and have recently gained added attention due to Farrell and Shapiro's (2010) article. No market definition is involved.…”
Section: Is the Hypothetical Monopolist Test Ever Useful?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, as is now familiar, the way to predict the price elevation resulting from the merger is to determine the diversion ratio between the firms' products (suppose, for simplicity, that each sells only one) and use the levels of the premerger markups for each to determine how much price will rise. These ideas are long familiar from critical loss analysis-e.g., Baker and Bresnahan (1985), Harris and Simons (1989), O'Brien and Wickelgren (2003)-and have recently gained added attention due to Farrell and Shapiro's (2010) article. No market definition is involved.…”
Section: Is the Hypothetical Monopolist Test Ever Useful?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the essence of "critical loss analysis" [Harris and Simons (1989)]. For a critique of common uses of critical loss analysis, focusing on the importance of checking if those rough estimates of customer switching and margins are consistent with the firms' pre-merger behavior, see Katz and Shapiro (2003) and O'Brien and Wickelgren (2003). the price in market A so that p A = c + t. If t and c are independently distributed, then the correlation between the prices in the two markets is…”
Section: Defining the Relevant Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 O'Brien and Wickelgren (2003) reformulated the critical loss analysis for defining the relevant market to employ diversion ratios rather than price elasticities. See also Katz and Shapiro (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%