2020
DOI: 10.1038/s43016-020-0051-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CRISPR way for accelerating improvement of food crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
94
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our view, the EU should embrace 'sustainable intensification' practices that use new technologies to boost crop yields. For example, gene-editing techniques (such as CRISPR-Cas) can enhance the edible mass, height and pest resistance of plants without using genes from another species 9 . Unlike the United States and China, the EU is currently treating CRISPR as conventional GM technology and lags behind them in CRISPR patents for agricultural use (18 in Europe, 61 in the United States and 259 in China) as well as in investments in such research 10 .…”
Section: Eu Import Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our view, the EU should embrace 'sustainable intensification' practices that use new technologies to boost crop yields. For example, gene-editing techniques (such as CRISPR-Cas) can enhance the edible mass, height and pest resistance of plants without using genes from another species 9 . Unlike the United States and China, the EU is currently treating CRISPR as conventional GM technology and lags behind them in CRISPR patents for agricultural use (18 in Europe, 61 in the United States and 259 in China) as well as in investments in such research 10 .…”
Section: Eu Import Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While genetically modifying quinoa using genome editing strategies seems to be feasible, such an approach would generate plants that might be subjected to strict GM regulation in some countries ( Zhang et al , 2020 ). For instance, a recent ruling of the European Court (Case C-528/16) has declared that any plant product generated with the use of new genome editing technologies is subjected to GM regulation, regardless of whether or not a transgene is present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive investigation in this field led to the development of new genome-editing tools, such as CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cpf1 [12,13]. Initially, these techniques were developed in prokaryotes, because there were no efficient genome-editing techniques for eukaryotes at specific sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%