2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupled immersed boundary and immersed interface method for interfacial flows with soluble surfactant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) The numerical algorithm for the second-order immersed interface method code: At t n the drop shape x, flow field u, and interface velocity, U are computed using the electrohydrodynamic solver in [35,77]. The information is then used as input to the surfactant transport solver [78], in order to determine the bulk (φ) and interface surfactant profile (Γ). Given Γ, we determine the change in surface tension γ, as well as the updated drop shape, flow field, and interface velocity at time t n+1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) The numerical algorithm for the second-order immersed interface method code: At t n the drop shape x, flow field u, and interface velocity, U are computed using the electrohydrodynamic solver in [35,77]. The information is then used as input to the surfactant transport solver [78], in order to determine the bulk (φ) and interface surfactant profile (Γ). Given Γ, we determine the change in surface tension γ, as well as the updated drop shape, flow field, and interface velocity at time t n+1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we implement a numerical code based on the immersed interface method (IIM) integrating numerical tools developed by our group [35,77,78]. A description of the numerical setup is provided in A, together with numerical validation in B and convergence study in C.…”
Section: B Nondimensionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boukharfane et al (2018) applied the direct-forcing method and the ghost-cell method together to enforce no-slip and nopenetration boundary conditions at the interphase interface in studying compressible reactive flows over immersed objects, respectively. Hu et al (2018) employed the original IB method to study the moving of an irregular domain while the IIM is used to study the convection-diffusion problem at the domain interface. Meyer et al (2010) coupled the IIM with the cut-cell method to maintain high accuracy, together with a combination of level-set method, which showed excellent mass and momentum conservation for arbitrary moving and deforming boundaries.…”
Section: Hybrid Immersed Boundary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key point in the IIM and the cut-cell method is to enforce the Neumann boundary condition for pressure to ensure no-penetration at the surface. The given derivatives at the interface could be easily integrated into the calculation of jump conditions and spatial and temporal discretization process for the IIM (Hu et al 2018;Meyer et al 2010) or in the calculation of the surface derivatives and values in a finite-volume solver (Schneiders et al 2013).…”
Section: Implementation Of Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation