2016
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2016.1260087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupled CFD-Monte Carlo method for simulating complex aerosol dynamics in turbulent flows

Abstract: A coupled computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-Monte Carlo method is presented to simulate complex aerosol dynamics in turbulent flows. A Lagrangian particle method-based probability density function (PDF) transport equation is formulated to solve the population balance equation (PBE) of aerosol particles. The formulated CFD-Monte Carlo method allows investigating the interaction between turbulence and aerosol dynamics and incorporating individual aerosol dynamic kernels as well as obtaining full particle size d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PBE is a partial integral-differential equation; analytical solutions of the PBE are available for only a few ideal cases (Von Smoluchowski, 1916). In general, approximate solutions can be obtained using various numerical methods such as the sectional method (SM) (Gelbard et al , 1980; Prakash et al , 2003), method of moments (Frenklach, 2002; Yu et al , 2008; Yu et al , 2016; Chan et al , 2018) and Monte Carlo (MC) method (Zhao et al , 2009; Zhou and He, 2014; Zhou et al , 2014; Liu and Chan, 2017a, 2017b, 2018a). However, there are two disadvantages to MC methods, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PBE is a partial integral-differential equation; analytical solutions of the PBE are available for only a few ideal cases (Von Smoluchowski, 1916). In general, approximate solutions can be obtained using various numerical methods such as the sectional method (SM) (Gelbard et al , 1980; Prakash et al , 2003), method of moments (Frenklach, 2002; Yu et al , 2008; Yu et al , 2016; Chan et al , 2018) and Monte Carlo (MC) method (Zhao et al , 2009; Zhou and He, 2014; Zhou et al , 2014; Liu and Chan, 2017a, 2017b, 2018a). However, there are two disadvantages to MC methods, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QMC models produce a new stochastic way to solve PBM and help determining various micro-scale flocculation behaviors, which provides new prospects to improve low cost bio-flocculation models to couple with large-scale model. Possibly coupled with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in turbulent flow (Liu and Chan, 2017;Xu et al, 2017), the QMC based PBMs also have the potential to simulate the interactions between turbulence and flocculated particles in the future.…”
Section: Connections With Field-scale Sediment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its generalized form, the PBE includes an accumulation term, convection and diffusion terms for each dimension of the phase space, and the source terms ascribed to the birth and death of particles with a distribution of properties . To solve the PBE, numerous methods have been developed; for example, the Monte Carlo method, the discrete method, the standard method of moments (SMM), the quadrature method of moments (QMOM), and the direct quadrature method of moments (DQMOM) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%