2021
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2021.194.3.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A counterexample to the unit conjecture for group rings

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We write supp(f ) := { s ∈ S : a s = 0 } for the support of f . In the noncommutative setting, in general, the problem of characterising (semi)group algebras that are domains is a very hard one, known as Kaplansky's zero-divisor conjecture [Pas77, Chapter 13], as is the related characterisation of units (with a recent counterexample to the unit conjecture given by Gardam [Gar21]). To avoid these issues, we work with right orderable monoids.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We write supp(f ) := { s ∈ S : a s = 0 } for the support of f . In the noncommutative setting, in general, the problem of characterising (semi)group algebras that are domains is a very hard one, known as Kaplansky's zero-divisor conjecture [Pas77, Chapter 13], as is the related characterisation of units (with a recent counterexample to the unit conjecture given by Gardam [Gar21]). To avoid these issues, we work with right orderable monoids.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3.4 with N = {e}). Example 3.9 Let P be Passman's fours group [5,11], which is a non-split extension 1 → Z 3 → P → Z/2Z × Z/2Z → 1. Note that P is torsion-free.…”
Section: Example 37mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, we notice that G is not a unique product group because P is not (cf. [11]). Indeed, there are non-empty finite subsets A, B of P witnessing that P is not a unique product group.…”
Section: Example 37mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations