2005
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Combination Antiplatelet Therapy for High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes: Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resource Considerations-Six studies 33,[49][50][51][52][53] examined the cost-effectiveness of combined antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin vs aspirin alone in patients after a recent ACS. These studies are consistent in demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of combined antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone after ACS.…”
Section: Aspirin and Clopidogrel Vs Aspirinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource Considerations-Six studies 33,[49][50][51][52][53] examined the cost-effectiveness of combined antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin vs aspirin alone in patients after a recent ACS. These studies are consistent in demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of combined antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone after ACS.…”
Section: Aspirin and Clopidogrel Vs Aspirinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After cessation of clopidogrel, platelet function is ~50% of normal at 3 days and back to normal after 7 days. 17 Integrin αIIbβ3 (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa) antagonists are potent inhibitors of platelet function. Three antagonists are currently approved for use in the United States.…”
Section: Medicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies (25,26,32,33) using CVD models have also estimated the reduction in CV event risk with combination therapy in cohorts of high-risk patients in the United States and the developing countries. The strength of the present study for Canadian decision makers is that it used Canadian epidemiological and practice pattern data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%