2018
DOI: 10.1051/epjap/2018180155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A correction method of hole-to-hole variation mass flow of diesel injector equipped on a common-rail DI diesel engine

Abstract: In the present paper, the inner flow characteristic and cavitation phenomena for different injector shapes (characterized by angle a and length-diameter ratio) are analyzed experimentally and numerically. Mathematical models including multi-phases model, volume of fluid model and the k-epsilon turbulence model are validated by experiment. The numerical results show that with the increase of injection angle a, the inception time of cavitation is earlier, the extension velocity of cavitation to nozzle exit is hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the gas-liquid flow in the micro-nozzles, it is necessary to verify the cavitation model and the turbulence model. As mentioned earlier, a visualization experiment through a simplified nozzle at the angle of 0 °has been carried out (Salvador et al, 2010;Qiu et al, 2016;Li et al, 2018;Li et al, 2019). The results show that with the increase of the injection pressure, a variation process of cavitation that is approximate to that in the experiment is simulated as Figure 1.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…To verify the gas-liquid flow in the micro-nozzles, it is necessary to verify the cavitation model and the turbulence model. As mentioned earlier, a visualization experiment through a simplified nozzle at the angle of 0 °has been carried out (Salvador et al, 2010;Qiu et al, 2016;Li et al, 2018;Li et al, 2019). The results show that with the increase of the injection pressure, a variation process of cavitation that is approximate to that in the experiment is simulated as Figure 1.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 76%