2014
DOI: 10.5392/ijoc.2014.10.4.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Corpus-Based Study on Korean EFL Learners' Use of English Logical Connectors

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(J 001) Also notice the use of informal expression "this thing" used by the writers and the comparative value of CAUSAL 'so' as shown in Table 5. Colloquial expressions and the use of informal linking adverbials such as so shown here were also reported in Korean learner corpus (Ha, 2014 Lei (2012) has commented that students' overuse of certain linking adverbials may perhaps be attempts to 'cover up' their poor writing. Students' overuse of ADDITIVE and SEQUENTIAL as we have seen in the corpus, did not add variation in the content nor did they add complexity in the argument structure as the linkers chosen merely enlisted similar points from the same perspectives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…(J 001) Also notice the use of informal expression "this thing" used by the writers and the comparative value of CAUSAL 'so' as shown in Table 5. Colloquial expressions and the use of informal linking adverbials such as so shown here were also reported in Korean learner corpus (Ha, 2014 Lei (2012) has commented that students' overuse of certain linking adverbials may perhaps be attempts to 'cover up' their poor writing. Students' overuse of ADDITIVE and SEQUENTIAL as we have seen in the corpus, did not add variation in the content nor did they add complexity in the argument structure as the linkers chosen merely enlisted similar points from the same perspectives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, learners even at an advanced stage of language acquisition still lag behind native speakers in their mastery of connectives in L2. Several corpus studies report the difficulties that L2-learners encounter to master discourse connectives adequately and specify for example that non-native speakers overuse corrobative and additive connectives (e.g., Field and Oi 1992;Milton and Tsang 1993;Granger and Tyson 1996;Tapper 2005), underuse contrastive or adversative connectives (e.g., Ha 2014;Shi 2017), or misuse contrastive or adversative connectives (e.g., Milton and Tsang 1993;Park 2013;Ha 2014). Further, several studies show that texts written by non-native speakers have a lower variety of connectives in comparison with native speaker texts (e.g., Liu and Braine 2005;Don and Sriniwass 2017;cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the importance of cognitive complexity and frequency as factors explaining individual variations between connectives and speakers have, to our knowledge, not been assessed in the context of second language acquisition, and neither have the correlations between the mastery of connectives and the degree of exposure to print. Third, we chose to assess learners' mastery of connectives through a constrained experimental production task, contrary to most previous studies that have resorted to corpus analyses and texts comparisons (such as Field and Oi 1992;Milton and Tsang 1993;Granger and Tyson 1996;Bolton et al 2002;Tapper 2005;Pit 2007;Ha 2014;Hu and Li 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Years of study on English writing have established logical connectors as an impediment to mastering the skill (Ha, 2014). In the same study by Ha (2014), ESL and EFL teachers have revealed that logical connectors are either misused or overused by their students.…”
Section: Logical Connectors In Efl Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Years of study on English writing have established logical connectors as an impediment to mastering the skill (Ha, 2014). In the same study by Ha (2014), ESL and EFL teachers have revealed that logical connectors are either misused or overused by their students. Yanti and Basthomi (2019) further cited Gazzar (2006) who found that students' writing demonstrates weak cohesion due to the lack and inappropriate use of connectors, long distance between cohesive relations in a structure, and uncertain opinions that led to several interpretations.…”
Section: Logical Connectors In Efl Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%