2020
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2020.2971210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Coordinate Descent Framework for Probing Signal Design in Cognitive MIMO Radars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (13) represents the receiver output for the reflected signal from the p-th target. The first factor of the right side describes spatial processing at the receiver and is not affected by the waveforms γ m (t).…”
Section: Multi-input Multi-output Radar Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (13) represents the receiver output for the reflected signal from the p-th target. The first factor of the right side describes spatial processing at the receiver and is not affected by the waveforms γ m (t).…”
Section: Multi-input Multi-output Radar Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…s , we consider the design of its entries consecutively, using the Coordinate Descent (CD) approach [34]- [37], which enables such an optimization by assuming one entry of the code vector s ∈ C N as the variable, keeping all the others fixed. By examining all the possible alphabet for the chosen variable, it selects the option which, with the correspondent filter, leads to the best SINR.…”
Section: Joint Waveform and Receiver Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint design focuses on suppressing the interference in different directions through the adaptive beamforming technique, giving full play to the advantages of the transmitter and the receive filter to process the interference, making the radar output SINR maximum. Since the objective function is usually a quadratic function, and the constraints imposed on the waveform are usually non-convex [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 11 , 16 , 17 , 24 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ], it is difficult to solve the optimization problem [ 31 ]. Various methods [ 3 , 11 , 14 , 16 , 23 , 31 , 35 , 36 , 37 ] are used to solve the non-convex optimization problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods [ 3 , 11 , 14 , 16 , 23 , 31 , 35 , 36 , 37 ] are used to solve the non-convex optimization problem. Feraidooni and Gharavian developed in [ 31 ] an algorithm for the joint design of a continuous/discrete [ 33 , 34 , 36 ] phase sequence and space-time receive filter to improve SINR, using the coordinate descent framework to deal with the constrained non-convex problem. Also, another joint design method is designed in [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%