1918
DOI: 10.1086/332346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contribution to the Life History of Impatiens sultani

Abstract: This paper is based upon a study of slides made through a series of years for class use in the Botany Department of Wellesley College. The material was taken from greenhouse plants of the rose or bright pink variety of Impatiens Sultani Hook. The bright red and light pink varieties also were growing in the greenhouse, but care was taken to collect material from the rose-flowered plants only. Some of the plants from which the flowers were collected were chance seedlings. No attempt was made to determine whether… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1933
1933
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both species need to be reinvestigated Jonsson (1879-80) This is certainly incorrect, for Roy (1933) Jonsson (1879-80) As pointed out by Andersson (1931). this is incorrect BALSAMINACEAE Ottley (1918) Schurhoff (1931, p. 328) thinks this to be a mistake and regards the development as normal RHAMNACEAE Chiarugi (1930) Dahlgren (1928), Johri (1936ft) Johri (19366) Dahlgren (1928) Dahlgren (1934) Dahlgren (1928) Johri ( in the chalazal part of the embryo sac, which is commonly 5-nucleate. Narasimha-Murthy (1933) Maheshwari & Singh (1934) report Normal-type in C. benghalensis and it is almost certain that C. stricla will also be found to be so on reinvestigation PALMACEAE Radermacher (1925) .…”
Section: The Types Of Enibryo Sacs In Angiosperms 375mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both species need to be reinvestigated Jonsson (1879-80) This is certainly incorrect, for Roy (1933) Jonsson (1879-80) As pointed out by Andersson (1931). this is incorrect BALSAMINACEAE Ottley (1918) Schurhoff (1931, p. 328) thinks this to be a mistake and regards the development as normal RHAMNACEAE Chiarugi (1930) Dahlgren (1928), Johri (1936ft) Johri (19366) Dahlgren (1928) Dahlgren (1934) Dahlgren (1928) Johri ( in the chalazal part of the embryo sac, which is commonly 5-nucleate. Narasimha-Murthy (1933) Maheshwari & Singh (1934) report Normal-type in C. benghalensis and it is almost certain that C. stricla will also be found to be so on reinvestigation PALMACEAE Radermacher (1925) .…”
Section: The Types Of Enibryo Sacs In Angiosperms 375mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andersson (1931). this is incorrect BALSAMINACEAE Ottley (1918) Schurhoff (1931, p. 328) thinks this to be a mistake and regards the development as normal Dahlgren (1928), Johri (1936ft) Johri (19366) Dahlgren (1928) Dahlgren (1934) Dahlgren (1928) Johri (…”
Section: The Types Of Enibryo Sacs In Angiosperms 375mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the presence of intra-archesporic sterile protrusions in Impatiens, two hypotheses have been proposed for the origin of this secretory tissue: Narayana (1963) proposed a double origin, namely parietal and archesporic, whereas Ottley (1918) argues for a completely archesporic nature. Observations of developmental stages preceding the MMC stage, which is not covered in this study, will elucidate the origin of these protrusions.…”
Section: Tapetum Maturationmentioning
confidence: 99%