2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2006.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A contingency model of computer and Internet self-efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the principal novel contributions of the present study is its inclusion of users' aptitude for using computer as a variable that moderate the value-satisfaction relationship. In particular, the study tests for the first time whether aptitude which have been extensively analyzed in the literature [15][16][17] may influence the relationship between satisfaction and perceived quality. The rest of the article is structured as follows.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the principal novel contributions of the present study is its inclusion of users' aptitude for using computer as a variable that moderate the value-satisfaction relationship. In particular, the study tests for the first time whether aptitude which have been extensively analyzed in the literature [15][16][17] may influence the relationship between satisfaction and perceived quality. The rest of the article is structured as follows.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research has indicated that training can improve attitudes and self-efficacy related to e-health resources [69][70][71]. Because VHA providers have opportunities to promote e-mental health to patients as a potential form of care, training is needed so that staff members have up-to-date knowledge about these resources, including training on how to best disseminate e-mental health resources to Veterans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally described as having three components: (1) magnitude -the levels of task difficulty that people believe they can reach; (2) strength-their conviction about its magnitude; and (3) generality -the degree to which the expectation is generalized across situations. The purpose in evaluating these components is to discover the type of questions suitable in explaining and predicting a person's dispositions, intentions, and actions (Torkzadeh et al, 2006). …”
Section: Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research studies suggest that computer experience (Aşkar and Davenport, 2009;Fagan et al, 2003;Hasan, 2003;Igbaria and Livari, 1995;Karsten and Roth, 1998;Ortiz de Guinea, 2004;Potosky, 2002;Topkaya, 2010;Torkzadeh and Koufteros, 1994) is positively related to computer self-efficacy. Also, computer training is highly related to computer self-efficacy (Torkzadeh et al, 2006). On the other hand, it was found that there was no significant correlation between computer training and computer self-efficacy (Yılmaz et al, 2006).…”
Section: Attitude Towards Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%