Abstract:This paper provides a comprehensive review of 71 previous studies on the life cycle assessment (LCA) of nanomaterials (NMs) from 2001 to 2020 (19 years). Although various studies have been carried out to assess the efficiency and potential of wastes for nanotechnology, little attention has been paid to conducting a comprehensive analysis related to the environmental performance and hotspot of NMs, based on LCA methodology. Therefore, this paper highlights and discusses LCA methodology’s basis (goal and scope d… Show more
“…Although many studies have been published in the last few years, there are still many limitations, as there were in the beginnings of LCA application [ 238 ]. This has been stated in recent reviews [ 240 , 242 ], and it was also debated in an LCA Discussion Forum a few years ago [ 256 ]. Some of those limitations are related to the system boundary considerations.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment and Nanosafetymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the last two decades, a number of studies related to the LCA application in a wide range of nanotechnology fields, using different types of nanomaterials, have been conducted in a total of 128 works ( Figure 9 ). The reference studies are from 2001 to 2022 and were mostly recompiled from a few review studies [ 240 , 241 , 242 ] and from [ 222 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 ]. From this analysis, it is possible to observe a wide variety of nanomaterials and application fields.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment and Nanosafetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a critical problem is that most of the existing LCA studies do not consider the end-of-life management scenarios (e.g., wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), incineration, and landfill) that could act as sink compartments where the nanomaterials potentially accumulate [ 19 ]. Actually, to the best of our knowledge, there is no international regulation on the disposal management of nanomaterials [ 242 ]. This could be a concern accounting for the increased availability of nano-enabled products which will eventually enter into various waste treatment processes with no specific treatment being considered [ 257 ].…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment and Nanosafetymentioning
The use of nanomaterials has been increasing in recent times, and they are widely used in industries such as cosmetics, drugs, food, water treatment, and agriculture. The rapid development of new nanomaterials demands a set of approaches to evaluate the potential toxicity and risks related to them. In this regard, nanosafety has been using and adapting already existing methods (toxicological approach), but the unique characteristics of nanomaterials demand new approaches (nanotoxicology) to fully understand the potential toxicity, immunotoxicity, and (epi)genotoxicity. In addition, new technologies, such as organs-on-chips and sophisticated sensors, are under development and/or adaptation. All the information generated is used to develop new in silico approaches trying to predict the potential effects of newly developed materials. The overall evaluation of nanomaterials from their production to their final disposal chain is completed using the life cycle assessment (LCA), which is becoming an important element of nanosafety considering sustainability and environmental impact. In this review, we give an overview of all these elements of nanosafety.
“…Although many studies have been published in the last few years, there are still many limitations, as there were in the beginnings of LCA application [ 238 ]. This has been stated in recent reviews [ 240 , 242 ], and it was also debated in an LCA Discussion Forum a few years ago [ 256 ]. Some of those limitations are related to the system boundary considerations.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment and Nanosafetymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the last two decades, a number of studies related to the LCA application in a wide range of nanotechnology fields, using different types of nanomaterials, have been conducted in a total of 128 works ( Figure 9 ). The reference studies are from 2001 to 2022 and were mostly recompiled from a few review studies [ 240 , 241 , 242 ] and from [ 222 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 ]. From this analysis, it is possible to observe a wide variety of nanomaterials and application fields.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment and Nanosafetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a critical problem is that most of the existing LCA studies do not consider the end-of-life management scenarios (e.g., wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), incineration, and landfill) that could act as sink compartments where the nanomaterials potentially accumulate [ 19 ]. Actually, to the best of our knowledge, there is no international regulation on the disposal management of nanomaterials [ 242 ]. This could be a concern accounting for the increased availability of nano-enabled products which will eventually enter into various waste treatment processes with no specific treatment being considered [ 257 ].…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment and Nanosafetymentioning
The use of nanomaterials has been increasing in recent times, and they are widely used in industries such as cosmetics, drugs, food, water treatment, and agriculture. The rapid development of new nanomaterials demands a set of approaches to evaluate the potential toxicity and risks related to them. In this regard, nanosafety has been using and adapting already existing methods (toxicological approach), but the unique characteristics of nanomaterials demand new approaches (nanotoxicology) to fully understand the potential toxicity, immunotoxicity, and (epi)genotoxicity. In addition, new technologies, such as organs-on-chips and sophisticated sensors, are under development and/or adaptation. All the information generated is used to develop new in silico approaches trying to predict the potential effects of newly developed materials. The overall evaluation of nanomaterials from their production to their final disposal chain is completed using the life cycle assessment (LCA), which is becoming an important element of nanosafety considering sustainability and environmental impact. In this review, we give an overview of all these elements of nanosafety.
“…Thus it is difficult to compare the results between studies [ 138 ]. Furthermore, there are only very few mentions in the literature about the environmental performance of nanomaterials based on LCA methods which also has some limitations, including a lack of life cycle inventory data and characterization factors for NMs’ emissions [ 139 , 140 ]. Figure 10 depicts the simplified framework for the LCA of nanocomposite materials.…”
Section: Lifecycle Analysis Of Nanocompositesmentioning
In recent years, the demand for environmental sustainability has caused a great interest in finding novel polymer materials from natural resources that are both biodegradable and eco-friendly. Natural biodegradable polymers can displace the usage of petroleum-based synthetic polymers due to their renewability, low toxicity, low costs, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. The development of novel starch-based bionanocomposites with improved properties has drawn specific attention recently in many applications, including food, agriculture, packaging, environmental remediation, textile, cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and biomedical fields. This paper discusses starch-based nanocomposites, mainly with nanocellulose, chitin nanoparticles, nanoclay, and carbon-based materials, and their applications in the agriculture, packaging, biomedical, and environment fields. This paper also focused on the lifecycle analysis and degradation of various starch-based nanocomposites.
“…It is clear that a complete sustainability analysis (from environmental and economic perspectives) is necessary. Unfortunately, only very recently have some general reports regarding the sustainable design of engineered nanomaterials and the future prospects of the life cycle assessment of nanomaterials been published [61,62].…”
In recent years, the number of articles reporting the addition of nanomaterials to enhance the process of anaerobic digestion has exponentially increased. The benefits of this addition can be observed from different aspects: an increase in biogas production, enrichment of methane in biogas, elimination of foaming problems, a more stable and robust operation, absence of inhibition problems, etc. In the literature, one of the current focuses of research on this topic is the mechanism responsible for this enhancement. In this sense, several hypotheses have been formulated, with the effect on the redox potential caused by nanoparticles probably being the most accepted, although supplementation with trace materials coming from nanomaterials and the changes in microbial populations have been also highlighted. The types of nanomaterials tested for the improvement of anaerobic digestion is today very diverse, although metallic and, especially, iron-based nanoparticles, are the most frequently used. In this paper, the abovementioned aspects are systematically reviewed. Another challenge that is treated is the lack of works reported in the continuous mode of operation, which hampers the commercial use of nanoparticles in full-scale anaerobic digesters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.