2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2014.6854025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A constrained-based optimization approach for seismic data recovery problems

Abstract: Random and structured noise both affect seismic data, hiding the reflections of interest (primaries) that carry meaningful geophysical interpretation. When the structured noise is composed of multiple reflections, its adaptive cancellation is obtained through time-varying filtering, compensating inaccuracies in given approximate templates. The under-determined problem can then be formulated as a convex optimization one, providing estimates of both filters and primaries. Within this framework, the criterion to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, a careful partnership between sparse representations and adaptive filtering was deemed beneficial in 1D, with respect to traditional 2D methods. To account for additional properties, including statistical distributions for primaries [7] and slow filter variations, [8,9] pursued seismic data adaptive filtering with 1D wavelet frames. Meanwhile, seismic images possess geometric regularity that advises a 2D approach for improved per-…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, a careful partnership between sparse representations and adaptive filtering was deemed beneficial in 1D, with respect to traditional 2D methods. To account for additional properties, including statistical distributions for primaries [7] and slow filter variations, [8,9] pursued seismic data adaptive filtering with 1D wavelet frames. Meanwhile, seismic images possess geometric regularity that advises a 2D approach for improved per-…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…m ∈ p i=1 C i . See, e.g., [Gragnaniello et al, 2012, Pham et al, 2014a,b, Smithyman et al, 2015, Peters and Herrmann, 2017, Esser et al, 2018, Yong et al, 2018, Peters et al, 2018. Alternatively, we can also formulate certain types of inverse problems directly as a feasibility (also known as set-theoretic estimation) or projection problem [Youla and Webb, 1982, Trussell and Civanlar, 1984, Combettes, 1993, 1996.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%