1996
DOI: 10.1214/aoap/1034968138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A consistent model selection procedure for Markov random fields based on penalized pseudolikelihood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it can be proven that some of the 1 -based approaches are consistent for model selection under particular scalings of the graph size, degrees, and number of samples [10], [14]; for the case where each degree is bounded by d, a similar consistency analysis has been performed for a heuristic method in the paper [4]. Other researchers [8], [6] have analyzed model selection criteria based on pseudolikelihood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it can be proven that some of the 1 -based approaches are consistent for model selection under particular scalings of the graph size, degrees, and number of samples [10], [14]; for the case where each degree is bounded by d, a similar consistency analysis has been performed for a heuristic method in the paper [4]. Other researchers [8], [6] have analyzed model selection criteria based on pseudolikelihood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose the use of a criterion derived from the BIC. A similar approach was used by [12] for choosing between different Markov random field models in the case where the true scene is directly observed and the number of segments is known in advance; neither of these is the case in the applications we have in mind. When, as here, the true scene is not observed, this would require evaluation of the likelihood of the observed data, LðY jKÞ, namely,…”
Section: Penalized Pseudolikelihood Criterion: Plicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to consider a penalized MPL to estimate the basic neighborhood of Markov random fields. Indeed, Smith and Miller formulated this conjecture [23] and Ji and Seymour proved the weak consistency of the estimator assuming the prior information of a finite set of possible basic neighborhoods [19]. Csiszár and Talata proved the strong consistency of the estimator without prior information [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%