2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conservative fully implicit algorithm for predicting slug flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We take advantage of this fact by providing to the solver a sparsity pattern consisting of an array of ones, indicating the elements in the Jacobian that are nonzero. This significantly reduces the computational time (e.g., see [22]).…”
Section: Numerical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take advantage of this fact by providing to the solver a sparsity pattern consisting of an array of ones, indicating the elements in the Jacobian that are nonzero. This significantly reduces the computational time (e.g., see [22]).…”
Section: Numerical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the incompressible form of the TFM, for (separated) stratified flow, assuming a hydrostatic balance between the fluids 5 . One reason this model is of interest, is its potential to dynamically simulate the transition from stratified flow to slug flow 6,7 . This stands in contrast to for example the drift‐flux model, where the two velocities are not modelled separately: instead a closure relation is introduced for their difference 8,9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 One reason this model is of interest, is its potential to dynamically simulate the transition from stratified flow to slug flow. 6,7 This stands in contrast to for example the drift-flux model, where the two velocities are not modelled separately: instead a closure relation is introduced for their difference. 8,9 The transition to slug flow can occur through hydrodynamic instabilities that arise naturally for the TFM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test case of multiphase flow in a pipe is particularly challenging due to the difficulties such as the space-time evolution of multiphase flow patterns (stratified, bubbly, slug, annular), the turbulent phase-tophase interactions, the drag, inertia and wake effects that arise for the HFM from the high aspect ratio (length to diameter) of the domain of a typical pipe. Many address this by developing one dimensional (flow regime-dependent or -independent) models for long pipes [78][79][80]. Nevertheless, such models contain some uncertainties as they rely on several closure or empirical expressions [81] under the limited experimental data [82] in describing, for example, the 3D space-time variations of interfacial frictional forces with phase distributions (the bubble/drop entrainment, the bubble-induced turbulence, the phase interfacial interactions), depending on the flow pattern, flow direction and pipe physical properties (inclination, diameter, length).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%