1994
DOI: 10.2307/2160840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Connection Between Weak Regularity and the Simplicity of Prime Factor Rings

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we show that a reduced ring R is weakly regular (i.e., I2 = I for each one-sided ideal / of R ) if and only if every prime ideal is maximal. This result extends several well-known results. Moreover, we provide examples which indicate that further generalization of this result is limited.Throughout this paper R denotes an associative ring with identity. All prime ideals are assumed to be proper. The prime radical of R and the set of nilpotent elements of R are denoted by P(R) and N(R), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover R\N * (R) is correspondent to Z\{0}, so every element in R\N * (R) is regular in R. Thus M at n (R) is quasi-NI by Proposition 1.5 (1).…”
Section: Quasi-ni Ringsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover R\N * (R) is correspondent to Z\{0}, so every element in R\N * (R) is regular in R. Thus M at n (R) is quasi-NI by Proposition 1.5 (1).…”
Section: Quasi-ni Ringsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Let A be a division ring and R = U n (A) or R = D n (A) for n ≥ 2. Then R is π-regular by [1,Corollary 6], and R is not regular by the existence of nonzero N * (R). Moreover R is quasi-NI by Proposition 2.1, but R is not reduced.…”
Section: About Ordinary Ring Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, D n (A) is π-regular by [5,Corollary 6], but it is clearly not regular when n ≥ 2. There exist many non-Abelian π-regular rings by [5,Corollary 6], as can be seen by U n (K) over a division ring K for n ≥ 2.…”
Section: Relations and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since N(R) is completely semiprime, Lemma 7 of [5] yields a"s\ • • • s k e N(7? ), where n = MI + h M/t.…”
Section: Let R Be a 2-primal Ring And P A Prime Ideal Of R (I) Ifr Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If xRs ^ 0, then there exists r e R such that xrs ^ 0. Since P(R) is completely semiprime, Lemma 7 of [5] yields xrs e P(R). Therefore O(P) + P(R) is right essential in P. LEMMA …”
Section: Let R Be a 2-primal Ring And P A Prime Ideal Of R Then: (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%