Proceedings 15th International Conference on Information Networking
DOI: 10.1109/icoin.2001.905423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conformance testing method for communication protocols modeled as concurrent DFSMs. Treatment of non-observable non-determinism

Abstract: According to the progress of high-speed networks, many communication protocols are specified as concurrent systems. Such systems can be modeled as concurrent deterministic FSMs (DFSMs). In those , protocols, a common input may be taken by some of concurrent DFSMs competitively. I n such a case, the global behaviour becomes non-deterministic in general. Conformance testing is typically a black-box testing, i.e. it is based on its specifcation. Formal methods for deriving conformance test cases are widely recogn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the classical MBT approach, the model is abstract, still it should contain enough details in order to test all the desired aspects of the SUT (system under test). The designer should spend a good amount of time to validate the model before it can be used for test generation and conformance testing [5,11,17,20]. In case a conformance fault is found, the system (or sometimes the model) should be modified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classical MBT approach, the model is abstract, still it should contain enough details in order to test all the desired aspects of the SUT (system under test). The designer should spend a good amount of time to validate the model before it can be used for test generation and conformance testing [5,11,17,20]. In case a conformance fault is found, the system (or sometimes the model) should be modified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%