1992
DOI: 10.1139/v92-044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A configuration interaction study of the ground and first excited 1+ states of the NaI molecule

Abstract: This perper is cledicnrecl to Professor Sigerlt Huzitlcrgn otz the occersiotl of his 65th Dirrt~dc~yYOSHIKO S A K A I , EISAKU MIYOSHI, and TOSINOBU ANNO. Can. J. Chem. 70, 309 (1992).Multireference singly and doubly excited CI (MRSDCI) calculations are performed on the NaI rnolecule by using a model potential method. The potential energy curves of the ground and first excited 'C+ states are generated over a wide range of internuclear distance R . The curves yield the avoided crossing, which is expected to ari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
22
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(44 reference statements)
8
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change in the sign of the adiabatic dipole moments at the crossing is due to change in the character of the ionic or covalent wave functions. The computed dipole moment at the experimental equilibrium distance of the NaI ground state is 9.44 Debye, in good agreement with the value of 9.41 Debye by Sakai et al 10 and the experimental value of 9.21 Debye by Hebert et al 24 The electronic Hamiltonian matrix relevant to the 0 ϩ adiabatic potential curves shown in Fig. 2 where the matrix elements a, b, and c are, respectively, the Fig.…”
Section: Potential Curvessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The change in the sign of the adiabatic dipole moments at the crossing is due to change in the character of the ionic or covalent wave functions. The computed dipole moment at the experimental equilibrium distance of the NaI ground state is 9.44 Debye, in good agreement with the value of 9.41 Debye by Sakai et al 10 and the experimental value of 9.21 Debye by Hebert et al 24 The electronic Hamiltonian matrix relevant to the 0 ϩ adiabatic potential curves shown in Fig. 2 where the matrix elements a, b, and c are, respectively, the Fig.…”
Section: Potential Curvessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The atomic basis set employed for Na has been taken from Ref. 10 and consists of (6s6p3d)/͓5s5p3d͔ Gaussian orbitals. The iodine atomic basis is an uncontracted set (6s7 p3d1 f ) and is described in more detail in our previous work.…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6,15 Overall, the NaI potentials are in reasonable agreement, not only with experiment but also with high-level ab initio calculations. 9,11 2. SolVation and Water Potentials.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6,8 Measurements of the adiabatic escape probability coupled with application of the Landau-Zener formalism for dynamical curve crossing lead to a value of V 12 (R x ) ) 415 cm -1 for the coupling matrix element between covalent and ionic Ω ) 0 + states, in close agreement with previous theoretical and experimental values. [13][14][15][16][17][18] Of relevance to the experiments described in the current work is a point raised previously by Rose et al concerning the appearance of the time-resolved fluorescence transient, 6 namely, that if absorption of the probe pulse by Ψ 2 (R;t) on the A 0 + potential takes place over a restricted range of coordinates centered about a particular R, then the second and subsequent real-time fluorescence peaks should comprise two closely separated maxima, corresponding to inward and outward bound propagation of the wave packet through the optically coupled region (OCR) defined by the probe pulse. 19,20 An attempt was made by Rose et al to observe such structure in the FTS transient by decreasing the pulse width of the probe laser; nevertheless, the anticipated splitting of the fluorescence peaks into a doublet line shape remained unobserved, though an increase in the width of the second peak relative to the first was noted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%