2000
DOI: 10.1063/1.481938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin–orbit effects in photodissociation of sodium iodide

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inQuartet states of the acetylene cation: Electronic structure calculations and spin-orbit coupling terms Extensive ab initio study of the valence and low-lying Rydberg states of BBr including spin-orbit coupling Photodissociation of alkyl and aryl iodides and effect of fluorination: Analysis of proposed mechanisms and vertical excitations by spin-orbit ab initio study Ab initio spin-orbit CI calculations of the potential curves and radiative lifetimes of low-lying states of lead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The diabatic-state electronic resonance coupling H 12 0 (R), obtained from the semiempirical VB calculations appears to have a more reasonable behavior than that of Zewail and co-workers, 5,7 in that it is exponential in the internuclear separation range R > 2.7 Å, in agreement with ab initio calculations. 11 The semiempirical VB theory value -0.06 eV of H 12 0 (R) at the crossing point is in rather good agreement with the accepted value -0.055 eV, for which there is a wide consensus, both theoretically and experimentally. 5,12,39,40 The secular equation is solved next for the two-state problem to yield the NaI adiabatic electronic ground (X 1 Σ + ) and first excited (A 1 Σ + ) states.…”
Section: Computational Methodologysupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 The diabatic-state electronic resonance coupling H 12 0 (R), obtained from the semiempirical VB calculations appears to have a more reasonable behavior than that of Zewail and co-workers, 5,7 in that it is exponential in the internuclear separation range R > 2.7 Å, in agreement with ab initio calculations. 11 The semiempirical VB theory value -0.06 eV of H 12 0 (R) at the crossing point is in rather good agreement with the accepted value -0.055 eV, for which there is a wide consensus, both theoretically and experimentally. 5,12,39,40 The secular equation is solved next for the two-state problem to yield the NaI adiabatic electronic ground (X 1 Σ + ) and first excited (A 1 Σ + ) states.…”
Section: Computational Methodologysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Figure 1) are in good agreement with multireference singly and doubly excited configuration interaction (MRCI) ab initio calculations by Sakai et al, 9 and more recent ones by Alekseyev et al that include spin-orbit coupling. 11 As expected, the first excited state exhibits a shallow well resulting from the avoided crossing of the ionic and covalent states. The gas-phase NaI Franck-Condon (FC) excitation energy predicted by our semiempirical VB model corresponds to a wavelength of 296 nm, which lies at the lower end of the experimental range of excitation wavelengths.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…There exist experimental data displaying clearly the revival periodicity. (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) Two systems satisfy the above conditions, they are the quantum harmonic oscillator and the infinite square well. They will be considered in Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There is a well documented experimental support of the phenomenon (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). For example in Ref.…”
Section: Some Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Figure 1 depicts the pump-probe scheme and the relevant potential curves for femtosecond photoelectron spectroscopy of the excited-state wave packet dynamics. The adiabatic excited state features an extended well whose character changes from covalent at shorter distances to ionic at larger distances due to an avoided crossing with the ground state at 7 A [22,23]. In the diabatic representation, the same system is viewed as an ionic curve (here called V 1 ) intersecting a covalent curve (V 2 ), with an associated nonadiabatic interaction (V 12 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%