1985
DOI: 10.3102/00346543055004485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Conceptual Model of Nontraditional Undergraduate Student Attrition

Abstract: Older, part-time, and commuter students have composed an increasingly larger portion of college student bodies. The reasons why these students drop out of school are not well understood. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rise in nontraditional enrollments, define the nontraditional undergraduate student, and develop a conceptual model of the attrition process for these students. The chief difference between the attrition process of traditional and nontraditional students is that nontraditional stude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

44
1,331
10
59

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,127 publications
(1,502 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
44
1,331
10
59
Order By: Relevance
“…Integration has been subject to critique, given its focus on traditional age student populations, its lack of attention to racial and ethnic differences, and the prescriptive aspect of the model (e.g., Bean & Metzner, 1985;Rendon, Jalomo, & Nora, 2000;Tierney, 2000). For students who are not traditional in terms of race/ethnicity, age, and full time enrollment status, the assumption is that in order to succeed in college (i.e., to persist) students must become integrated into the college environment by abandoning their history, heritage, and outside interests.…”
Section: Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Integration has been subject to critique, given its focus on traditional age student populations, its lack of attention to racial and ethnic differences, and the prescriptive aspect of the model (e.g., Bean & Metzner, 1985;Rendon, Jalomo, & Nora, 2000;Tierney, 2000). For students who are not traditional in terms of race/ethnicity, age, and full time enrollment status, the assumption is that in order to succeed in college (i.e., to persist) students must become integrated into the college environment by abandoning their history, heritage, and outside interests.…”
Section: Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This critique has prompted challenges to all three concepts. Specifically, a critique of involvement and engagement is that they are more applicable constructs for full time, traditional age, and residential students (Bean & Metzner, 1985). Kuh responded to this critique:…”
Section: Current Concerns and Implications For The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bean (1980), Bean and Metzner, (1985), Murtaugh, Burns andSchuster (1999), andHarmston (2004) among others have discussed the importance of college GPA in the attrition decision.…”
Section: A Human Capital Model Of Attritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For higher education, there is a long research tradition investigating this phenomenon. Such research foci has included: student involvement and academic success (Astin 1984), sociological underpinnings and student retention (Spady 1970), as well as the perceived utility of attending college for non-traditional students (Bean and Metzner 1985). However, the vast research in the past 40 years has been influenced by the work of Tinto.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%