2003
DOI: 10.1080/713609965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Conceptual Framework for Using Mussels as Biomonitors in Whole Effluent Toxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, by the chemical-based approach alone, we can only know the concentrations of individual compounds in the effluents (Sarakinos et al, 2000), which is not sufficient enough to assess ecological effects of toxic chemicals in industrial effluents (Burgess et al, 1995;Rosa et al, 2001). By WET testing alone, we can only measure the toxic effect of an effluent as a whole and account for uncharacterized sources of toxicity (Smolders et al, 2003), but it is difficult to identify the toxicants without chemical analysis of the pollutants (Fjällborg et al, 2006). Therefore there is a great need for methods to combine the chemical analysis and bioassay to evaluate the toxicity of effluents from different industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, by the chemical-based approach alone, we can only know the concentrations of individual compounds in the effluents (Sarakinos et al, 2000), which is not sufficient enough to assess ecological effects of toxic chemicals in industrial effluents (Burgess et al, 1995;Rosa et al, 2001). By WET testing alone, we can only measure the toxic effect of an effluent as a whole and account for uncharacterized sources of toxicity (Smolders et al, 2003), but it is difficult to identify the toxicants without chemical analysis of the pollutants (Fjällborg et al, 2006). Therefore there is a great need for methods to combine the chemical analysis and bioassay to evaluate the toxicity of effluents from different industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also well understood that no single biomarker has emerged as a widely used biomarker for contamination without some limitation, so a set of biomarkers is essential [79]. Measurements at biochemical or physiological levels detect more quickly and specifically the presence of several toxic compounds, allowing their utilization in a prospective way, until that deleterious effect reaches higher organization levels.…”
Section: Potential Use Of Biomarkers For Assessing the Effect Of Contmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, fate of individual chemicals is better understood and can be modeled easily to project exposure concentrations for Tier 1 assessments. In addition, component approaches are quantitative and can be used to establish remediation goals for specific contaminants (Ankley and Mount, 1996;Smolders et aL, 2003;Van Leeuwen et al, 1996).…”
Section: Risk Calculation Procedures For Component Dose Addition Apprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contaminants missed by chemical screening analyses or below the detection limit can contribute to toxicity (Ankley and Mount, 1996;Smolders et aL, 2003;Van Leeuwen et al, 1996). A component approach (additive HI) was shown to underestimate the toxicity of a lead smelter effluent due to metals or other toxicants in the mixture that were below detection limits; this underestimation was not due to interaction as an artificial mixture 59 iFcontaining the measured metals produced the predicted additive toxicity (Ross and Bidwell, 2003).…”
Section: Risk Calculation Procedures For Component Dose Addition Apprmentioning
confidence: 99%