2015
DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000000899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Conceptual Framework for Appropriateness in Surgical Care

Abstract: Innovations that foster high quality shared surgical decision making, in combination with successful elements of previous appropriateness methodologies, can reduce futile and unwanted procedures and increase the appropriateness of the care that our patients receive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This model also assumed that all reported historical surgical volumes were appropriately indicated for surgery, which may not always hold true and vary over time depending on variations in practice patterns. 45…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model also assumed that all reported historical surgical volumes were appropriately indicated for surgery, which may not always hold true and vary over time depending on variations in practice patterns. 45…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the type of procedure performed and the primary indication for that procedure can be useful in a variety of contexts. In particular, it is important for studies that evaluate whether or not a decision to have surgery was the result of a SDM process, since SDM interventions are often only applicable for certain procedures and indications where there are multiple treatment options available [ 22 , 23 ]. The algorithm developed in this study was able to classify surgical cases with the correct procedure and primary indication combination with high specificity across the four combinations analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nous aurions besoin de plus de données pour prédire la demande en chirurgie durant la reprise et la possible phase de réduction des interventions advenant d’autres vagues de COVID-19. De plus, nous avons présumé que toutes les interventions du volume attendu étaient cliniquement indiquées, alors que ce n’est probablement pas toujours le cas 29 . En ce qui concerne les tendances dans l’utilisation des ressources, il faut préciser qu’en raison d’une progression de la maladie, par exemple du cancer ou d’une affection cardiaque, les patients qui attendent plus longtemps avant d’être traités pourraient nécessiter plus de ressources que ceux traités avant la pandémie, voire ne plus être admissibles à l’opération.…”
Section: Interprétationunclassified