A concept for major incident triage: full-scaled simulation feasibility study

Abstract

BackgroundEfficient management of major incidents involves triage, treatment and transport. In the absence of a standardised interdisciplinary major incident management approach, the Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation developed Interdisciplinary Emergency Service Cooperation Course (TAS). The TAS-program was established in 1998 and by 2009, approximately 15 500 emergency service professionals have participated in one of more than 500 no-cost courses. The TAS-triage concept is based on the established triage Sieve and Paediatric Triage Tape models but modified with slap-wrap reflective triage tags and paediatric triage stretchers. We evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of the TAS-triage concept in full-scale simulated major incidents.MethodsThe learners participated in two standardised bus crash simulations: without and with competence of TAS-triage and access to TAS-triage equipment. The instructors calculated triage accuracy and measured time consumption while the learners participated in a self-reported before-after study. Each question was scored on a 7-point Likert scale with points labelled "Did not work" (1) through "Worked excellent" (7).ResultsAmong the 93 (85%) participating emergency service professionals, 48% confirmed the existence of a major incident triage system in their service, whereas 27% had access to triage tags. The simulations without TAS-triage resulted in a mean over- and undertriage of 12%. When TAS-Triage was used, no mistriage was found. The average time from "scene secured to all patients triaged" was 22 minutes (range 15-32) without TAS-triage vs. 10 minutes (range 5-21) with TAS-triage. The participants replied to "How did interdisciplinary cooperation of triage work?" with mean 4,9 (95% CI 4,7-5,2) before the course vs. mean 5,8 (95% CI 5,6-6,0) after the course, p < 0,001.ConclusionsOur modified triage Sieve tool is feasible, time-efficient and accurate in allocating priority during simulated bus accidents and may serve as a candidate for a future national standard for major incident triage.

Major incident preparedness and on-site work among Norwegian rescue personnel – a cross-sectional study

“…Further, only 56% of the EMS responders had access to triage tagging equipment, indicating a need for standardised solutions for triage and marking of priority [22]. Experience from the terrorist bombings in London showed that advanced pre-hospital skills improved triage accuracy [13]; however before such skills are available, simple concepts may improve the precision and speed of the triage process [26], as well as rationalise the evacuation of patients and the interdisciplinary cooperation at the scene of the accident [27]. The inquiry after the avalanche disaster in Vassdalen recommended the introduction of more stringent communication routines, better availability of rescue dogs and better avalanche response equipment [28].…”

Information Management in Large-scale Disaster Exercises: An Integrated Perspective

“…The post-disaster environment set up in this type of exercises approximates comprehensive field conditions [12] as close to a realistic intervention as possible [13]. Such realistic environment allows trainings to provide valuable results [14]. Field exercises comprise a series of events and a group of stakeholders.…”

Study of the severity of musculoskeletal injuries and triage during the 2005 Pakistan earthquake

“…& Restoration of health care infrastructure through a seismically safe and rationalised health care system & Practising continuous integrated triage in the disaster fields and subsequently in the hospitals to treat the maximum with whatever resources are at hand [18,19] & Providing an integrated health care delivery system covering preventive, curative and rehabilitation services ORIF open reduction and internal fixation & Strengthening the health services through revival of the management and organisational system…”