1981
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90110-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computer program for determining the size of DNA restriction fragments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…haze filter in tandem. Photographic negatives were scanned with an LKB densitometer in order to determine the position of each EcoRI fragment and the number of EcoRl fragments in each band; the computer program of Duggleby et al (1981) was used to determine the sizes, in kilobase pairs (kb), of DNA restriction fragments of the five plaque-purified isolates. The relative number of fragments in each band was estimated by cutting out and weighing each peak after scanning densitometry of the Tri-X negatives.…”
Section: Cells and Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…haze filter in tandem. Photographic negatives were scanned with an LKB densitometer in order to determine the position of each EcoRI fragment and the number of EcoRl fragments in each band; the computer program of Duggleby et al (1981) was used to determine the sizes, in kilobase pairs (kb), of DNA restriction fragments of the five plaque-purified isolates. The relative number of fragments in each band was estimated by cutting out and weighing each peak after scanning densitometry of the Tri-X negatives.…”
Section: Cells and Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragment sizes were calculated from the regression line, based on a set of standard-sized fragments (lambda DNA-Hind -III/phiX-174 RF DNA-Hinc digest), using a modification of the computer program described by Duggleby et al (24). Adjustment was made for the 5% variability in fragment sizes observed in replicate samples on different blots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrophoretic separation of the standard, Saccharomyces cerevis- iae YNN 295 (Bio-Rad), proved to be highly reproducible based on the actual and calculated DNA size and standard error of fit. Runs of several agarose inserts of the same strains and repeated separation of the same plugs resulted in mobilities within the deviation computed by the Duggelby method (9). Saccharomyces cerevisiae NRRL Y-2034 (Fig.…”
Section: Electrophoretic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 57%