s Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes, written with Maureen Hoskyn and Carole Lee, is a comprehensive meta-analytic study of over 30 years of intervention research encompassing 272 studies on students with learning disabilities (LD). Because "we have no clear understanding of the intervention approaches that work with a particular type of children with LD as a consequence of gender, age, intelligence, and/or level of achievement" (p. 7), this is a clearly needed addition to the literature base.Although there does exist a body of meta-analytical research in the field of learning disabilities (see Forness, Kavale, Blum, & Lloyd, 1997), it pales in comparison to the comprehensiveness of this text. The text is intended for academics and graduate students who are knowledgeable in research methodology, and have an interest in LD. More important, however, is the reader's ability to interpret these findings to teachers and parents who work directly with students with LD, thus translating research into practice. However, this meta-analysis is not without its shortcomings, as it was pointed out the "findings are only as good as the primary studies" (p. 2). This is partially addressed, however, by insuring that the included studies employed appropriate methodologies, focused on subjects with average intelligence who were exposed to an intervention on at least three sessions, and finally, that the outcomes were quantitatively measured.The text is organized into six chapters including a justification for the analysis and general research questions, methodology, group-and single-subject design outcomes, and a discussion of the findings and implications. A comprehensive list of the studies and coding forms included for analysis along with a description of each study that addressed sample size, selection criteria, treatment, measures, target domains (e.g., reading, writing, math), results, and effect sizes is provided in the Appendix. The studies that did not meet the selection criteria for the analysis are also listed in the Appendix.The implications derived from this meta-analytical study are discussed in detail particularly in regard to formulating school policies. Specific questions are posed and addressed on the basis of the study's results. For example, is there merit in pull-out programs, or is full-inclusion superior? According to the results, pull-out programs are superior. Is whole language or phonics superior in the remediation of reading problems? Results support both as producing positive outcomes. The authors also present specific evidenced-based instructional strategies that result in positive outcomes. In addition, general principles are presented which are based upon existing research, but may warrant further study. For example, do interventions for students with LD also benefit general education students?Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes written by H. Lee Swanson with Maureen Hoskyn and Carole Lee...