2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computer-aided automated methodology for the detection and classification of occlusal caries from photographic color images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
47
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation of attrition bias: Not all of the studies reported complete results. Berdouses et al [25] detailed all the results analyzed in the present review.…”
Section: Study Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Evaluation of attrition bias: Not all of the studies reported complete results. Berdouses et al [25] detailed all the results analyzed in the present review.…”
Section: Study Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The clinical parameters were further pruned to a compact yet informative subset to investigate informative variables that could distinguish low-risk patients from high-risk patients. This process is known as feature subset selection (FSS) [ 23 - 25 ], and we used the well-known Recursive Feature Elimination procedure based on SVM (RFE-SVM). The optimal subset with acceptable prognostic capabilities was obtained, and the SVM model was tested using a ten-fold cross-validation scheme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found two studies in which the authors detected different ICDAS scores on photographic images. Unfortunately, the results of one of them are not comparable to ours, since this study aimed exclusively at comparing the caries lesion detection performance of newly developed software to that of an ICDAS-experienced dentist using the same photographic images [ 26 ]. No comparison with clinical examination data was reported in this previously published article [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the results of one of them are not comparable to ours, since this study aimed exclusively at comparing the caries lesion detection performance of newly developed software to that of an ICDAS-experienced dentist using the same photographic images [ 26 ]. No comparison with clinical examination data was reported in this previously published article [ 26 ]. The authors of the other study used images of the buccal aspect of teeth from patients that had recently completed orthodontic treatment, with caries lesions in different stages of progression [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%