2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational study of the influence of viscoelasticity on the interfacial dynamics of dip coating flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness, h wet , of the dip-coated liquid film, called the wet film thickness, is controlled by the interplay of surface tension and gravity, which oppose film formation, and viscous forces, which draw liquid from the coating bath onto the substrate. ,, Whereas surface tension and gravity are process-independent, viscous forces can be controlled by the withdrawal speed u and solution CNT concentration (which affects viscosity). CNT concentration also affects the dry film thickness through h wet = h dry ϕ, where ϕ is the CNT volume fraction in the coating liquid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness, h wet , of the dip-coated liquid film, called the wet film thickness, is controlled by the interplay of surface tension and gravity, which oppose film formation, and viscous forces, which draw liquid from the coating bath onto the substrate. ,, Whereas surface tension and gravity are process-independent, viscous forces can be controlled by the withdrawal speed u and solution CNT concentration (which affects viscosity). CNT concentration also affects the dry film thickness through h wet = h dry ϕ, where ϕ is the CNT volume fraction in the coating liquid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments were also compared with the predictions of lubrication theory of power-law fluids [35,36]. Other studies on non-newtonian effects focused on coating flows [37,38,39,40] and moving contact lines [25,26,41,42,43], both experi-mentally [25,26,41,42] and numerically/theoretically [43,44,45]. Garoff and co-workers [25,26,41,42] conducted a series of experiments on dynamic wetting: by comparing the steady interface shape, they observed that the non-newtonian effect was confined to the close vicinity of the contact line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this occurs, the film becomes uniform and stable. Normal stress difference ( N ) has a film thickening effect if positive in the direction of flow . Film thickness increases with yield stress .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%