2012
DOI: 10.5402/2012/396831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Study Assessing Maximum Likelihood and Noniterative Methods for Estimating the Linear-by-Linear Parameter for Ordinal Log-Linear Models

Abstract: For ordinal log-linear models, the estimation of the parameter reflecting the linear-by-linear measure of association has long been a topic for the analysis of dependence for contingency tables. Typically, iterative procedures (including Newton's method) are used to determine the maximum likelihood estimate of the parameter. Recently Beh and Farver (2009, ANZJS, 51, 335-352) show by way of example three reliable and accurate noniterative techniques that can be used to estimate the parameter and extended this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From Tables 1 to 6, it can be seen that and , given by (2.2) and (2.3), provide estimates which are close to each other. The BDNI estimator underestimates the linear-by-linear association; confirming the findings of computational studies carried out by Beh and Farver (2012a, b, Zafar et al, 2013a, 2015. However, earlier Beh and Farver (2012a,b) showed using the Wald test that the BDNI and LogNI estimates are statistically similar to the estimates obtained by the Newton -Raphson method.…”
Section: Data and Designsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…From Tables 1 to 6, it can be seen that and , given by (2.2) and (2.3), provide estimates which are close to each other. The BDNI estimator underestimates the linear-by-linear association; confirming the findings of computational studies carried out by Beh and Farver (2012a, b, Zafar et al, 2013a, 2015. However, earlier Beh and Farver (2012a,b) showed using the Wald test that the BDNI and LogNI estimates are statistically similar to the estimates obtained by the Newton -Raphson method.…”
Section: Data and Designsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…To evaluate the performance and compare the non-iterative estimates of ϕ using (2) and (3)-and two additional Taylor-series approximations of (2)-with the estimates obtained using the iterative algorithm of Newton's method, [42,43] performed a series of simulation studies. As part of their studies, strategies needed to be considered for dealing with the presence of random zero-cell frequencies since the logarithm function in (2) leads to non-existent solutions for such cases.…”
Section: Non-iterative Estimation Of the Linear-by-linear Association...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, for example, [3] (Section 10.6.5), [23] (p. 119) and [58][59][60][61] for a discussion of this issue. In the simulations below, we shall be replacing a zero-cell frequency with 0.05, as [42][43][44] did. Note that determining φBDNI when random zero-cell frequencies are present does not suffer from this problem.…”
Section: Non-iterative Estimation Of the Linear-by-linear Association...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations