2004
DOI: 10.2138/am-2004-0119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational investigation of the Al/Fe/Mg order-disorder behavior in the dioctahedral sheet of phyllosilicates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[70,71] The segregation of Mg is consistent with experimentally observed behavior in smectites, illites [12] and nontronites. The clustering of Fe is in agreement with experimental results for natural illites and smectites from IR and NMR experiments and from RMC simulations based thereon.…”
Section: Review Wwwq-chemorgsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[70,71] The segregation of Mg is consistent with experimentally observed behavior in smectites, illites [12] and nontronites. The clustering of Fe is in agreement with experimental results for natural illites and smectites from IR and NMR experiments and from RMC simulations based thereon.…”
Section: Review Wwwq-chemorgsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We next considered the case of the octahedral phyllosilicate sheet, and the ordering behavior of the binary systems Al-Fe, Al-Mg, and Fe-Mg. [37,59,60] We will show later in Open circles indicate Si and filled circles Al (from Palin and Dove [71] with permission from America Mineralogical Society).…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the meta configuration, Mg 2+ and Al 3+ are always second neighbors, and are therefore the most stable configuration. Definitively, these energy differences come from the different interactions between both Al 3+ and Mg 2+ cations as first, second and third neighbors in the octahedral network [50,51]. Besides, the different configurations can also have different interactions with the interlayer cations [52] and atomic groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%