2016
DOI: 10.4050/jahs.61.032002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Framework for Helicopter Fuselage Drag Reduction Using Vortex Generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental activity included tests of VG arrays positioned on the helicopter back-ramp area. In particular, the four most promising sets of 2 × 8 co- and counter-rotating VGs resulting from the CFD optimisation (13) were considered for the wind-tunnel tests. The size and the pitch angle with respect to the local velocity field of the optimised VG configurations are reported in Table 1, where the chord length and the height of the VG are given with respect to the computed boundary layer displacement thickness (δ).…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental activity included tests of VG arrays positioned on the helicopter back-ramp area. In particular, the four most promising sets of 2 × 8 co- and counter-rotating VGs resulting from the CFD optimisation (13) were considered for the wind-tunnel tests. The size and the pitch angle with respect to the local velocity field of the optimised VG configurations are reported in Table 1, where the chord length and the height of the VG are given with respect to the computed boundary layer displacement thickness (δ).…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the latter group also investigated the shape of a fairing for blade attachments to be used together with the optimised hub cap for a further reduction of the drag due to the rotor hub. Moreover, ONERA numerically investigated the use of Vortex Generators (VGs) positioned on the fuselage back-ramp area (13) . In fact, the pronounced upsweep of the after-body shape characterising the blunt fuselages is responsible for a recirculating region at the junction with the tail boom that yields penalties on helicopter drag.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be highlighted that the effectiveness of micro-VGs is highly sensitive toward the exact implementation location and may not be entirely suitable in applications that involve complex flow behaviors. 6,7 Vortex generators may also possess geometries that take after rectangular, triangular, wishbone, and wedge configurations, 5 among others, which work at different performance levels that depend on the exact applications and flow conditions. In particular, for subsonic flows, which most aerodynamic applications are associated with, it had been reported that the divergent vane-type VGs have the highest efficiency in terms of flow separation and overall drag reductions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supersonic VGs can also reduce flow separation near the throat [9]. A 5% drag reduction can be achieved using proper VG configurations through cumulated effects of flow reattachment [10]. However, some researchers have revealed that, although VGs are simple devices, they still generate drag [11] because stronger vortices are generated by VGs in larger dimensions, which do not necessarily lead to better flow separation control [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%