2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational assessment of representative sampling of soil gas using existing groundwater monitoring wells screened across the water table

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant compositional changes also altered the viscosity and density of the LNAPL. Similar to previous dissolution simulations, the validated model again showed that multiphase, multicomponent modeling is essential to meaningfully predict changes in LNAPL composition and recovery endpoints (Sookhak Lari et al 2017).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Recovery Endpointssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significant compositional changes also altered the viscosity and density of the LNAPL. Similar to previous dissolution simulations, the validated model again showed that multiphase, multicomponent modeling is essential to meaningfully predict changes in LNAPL composition and recovery endpoints (Sookhak Lari et al 2017).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Recovery Endpointssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Other single-phase approaches such as SVE may be considered as subcategories of MPE. This would mean that the same modeling approach is applicable in characterizing bulk and composition endpoints for such single-phase approaches (Sookhak Lari et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional depths within the screened interval can be sampled, if needed, to determine the depth of the aerobic/anaerobic (A/A) boundary. Both high (EPA method) and low flow sampling methods were evaluated independently by Sookhak Lari et al (2017) at a field site in Australia. They concluded that the low flow sampling method for monitoring wells provided: “reasonably representative samples of vadose zone gas concentrations”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important assumption implicit in the low purge volume method is that the gas composition in the well bore will be essentially the same as the soil gas in the adjacent soil and sand pack. As shown by SookhakLari et al (), vapor extracted from a well at low flow rates can have a similar composition as the in situ gas at the base of the well. The effectiveness of the low purge volume method for obtaining a vapor sample from near the source can be evaluated in the field on the basis of the O 2 concentration monitored in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This can ­provide a more rapid and cost‐effective approach compared with installation of deep gas sampling probes at a site. The small purge volume method for sampling monitoring wells is advisable for sampling those sites with low permeability soils (McAlary et al ) and also should be considered, on a site‐specific basis, as an important new approach for evaluating NSZD potential at LNAPL sites using the gradient method (Johnson et al ).We note too that a computational assessment of low‐ and high‐volume gas sampling from existing long‐ and short‐screened wells has been undertaken recently (SookhakLari et al ). It is consistent with the findings presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%