Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of The Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2 2017
DOI: 10.18653/v1/e17-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Analysis of the Language of Drug Addiction

Abstract: We present a computational analysis of the language of drug users when talking about their drug experiences. We introduce a new dataset of over 4,000 descriptions of experiences reported by users of four main drug types, and show that we can predict with an F1-score of up to 88% the drug behind a certain experience. We also perform an analysis of the dominant psycholinguistic processes and dominant emotions associated with each drug type, which sheds light on the characteristics of drug users.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, not only the written verses but also music sheets. The parallel corpus from Strapparava et al (2012), which includes annotations on the notes and lyrics of popular music in English, can be leveraged to investigate the cooperation between textual features and musical features for emotion identification (Mihalcea and Strapparava 2012). In the case of operas, even scene representations could be taken into consideration in the decision process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, not only the written verses but also music sheets. The parallel corpus from Strapparava et al (2012), which includes annotations on the notes and lyrics of popular music in English, can be leveraged to investigate the cooperation between textual features and musical features for emotion identification (Mihalcea and Strapparava 2012). In the case of operas, even scene representations could be taken into consideration in the decision process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both MultiEmotion-It and FEEL-IT contain annotations at the document level (be it a tweet or a comment). As Strapparava et al (2012), who released a corpus of popular music in English, we go at the sub-document level and annotate single verses and arias.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has several attractive properties: its emotion word categories and the associated word lists have been validated through human evaluation (Tausczik and Pennebaker 2010), LIWC can be used with arbitrary datasets and requires no preprocessing of the input texts. As a result, LIWC has been used in a large number of psychological studies (Cohn et al 2004;Pennebaker and Graybeal 2001;Rude et al 2004;Stirman and Pennebaker 2001) and NLP studies (e.g., Mihalcea and Strapparava 2009;Nguyen et al 2011;Strapparava and Mihalcea 2017). For example, in a study on language and depression, Rude et al (2004) analyzed the language of depressed, formerly-depressed, and never-depressed students and found that, as one would expect, depressed participants used more negatively valenced words, but also, perhaps less expected, used the pronoun ''I'' more frequently than never-and formerly-depressed students.…”
Section: The Psychology Of Language and Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%