2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03248-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive review on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for improved biogas production by anaerobic digestion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 204 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 ). This result indicated that sterilization alone could negatively affect the biogas production although many researchers in the literature showed that sterilization had no influence on the anaerobic digestion or could enhance biogas production when combined with acid or alkaline pretreatment method [ 5 ]. The increased biogas production by sterilization combined with Trametes sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 ). This result indicated that sterilization alone could negatively affect the biogas production although many researchers in the literature showed that sterilization had no influence on the anaerobic digestion or could enhance biogas production when combined with acid or alkaline pretreatment method [ 5 ]. The increased biogas production by sterilization combined with Trametes sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lignocellulosic material, which is mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, is such a recalcitrant compound during the anaerobic fermentation. Previous studies showed that pretreatment to lignocellulosic material prior to anaerobic digestion could increase the yield of biogas production since the pretreatment could change the chemical composition and structure of lignocellulose and make natural lignocellulose macromolecules susceptible to degrade [ 5 ]. Currently, pretreatment technologies can be roughly classified into physical, chemical, and biological method [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high fractionation efficiency achieved with chemical and solvent methods, it has been observed that harsher pretreatment conditions can lead to the generation of unwanted inhibitory components, such as hydroxymethylfurfural, furfural, and their derivatives (i.e., sodium acetate, ferulic acid, furan derivatives, absorbable organic halogen, p-coumaric acids, and phenolics) (Madadi et al, 2022b). These compounds can hinder the hydrolysis and fermentation processes, impeding efficient VFA production and necessitating the additional removal of these inhibitory pollutants (Poddar et al, 2022).…”
Section: Chemical and Organic Solvent Pretreatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar result was reported by Wadchasit et al, 2020 who found that physical pretreatment (size reduction) increased methane Grinding pretreatment can increase pore size and accessible surface area. The reduction of particle size resists the acidification of the system (Poddar et al, 2022). A larger available surface area facilitates the degradation process and improves biogas production.…”
Section: Effect Of Physical Pretreatment On Biogas Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%