2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive review of research on reading comprehension strategies of learners reading in English-as-an-additional language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Test takers employ the same test taking strategies on multiple choice tests irrespective of text familiarity (Lee, 2015). Some previous studies reported that when L2 learners attempted the open-ended reading passages, they were found to locate where the answer was most probably to be in the comprehension passage and they write the whole sentence consisting of the answer in relation to the questions posed (Cohen & Aphek, 1979;Ghafournia & Afghari, 2013;Kashkoulia & Baratib, 2013;Lin et al, 2019;Song et al, 2020).…”
Section: Previous Studies and The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test takers employ the same test taking strategies on multiple choice tests irrespective of text familiarity (Lee, 2015). Some previous studies reported that when L2 learners attempted the open-ended reading passages, they were found to locate where the answer was most probably to be in the comprehension passage and they write the whole sentence consisting of the answer in relation to the questions posed (Cohen & Aphek, 1979;Ghafournia & Afghari, 2013;Kashkoulia & Baratib, 2013;Lin et al, 2019;Song et al, 2020).…”
Section: Previous Studies and The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asimismo, los resultados de Gavora et al (2020) sugieren que los enfoques estratégicos de lectura más sofisticados -como los analíticos o metacognitivos-se asocian significativamente con el éxito del rendimiento académico, aunque su asociación sea baja. Las mayores frecuencias de uso de las estrategias literales de lectura en este mismo grupo implican el planteamiento de actividades en las que el rol de lectura es el de fuente de información y, en menor medida, de estrategias intertextuales cuyas prácticas son más demandadas en la universidad al trabajar con textos múltiples (Britt et al, 2018;Song et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Por último, dado que la lectura es una tarea orientada a la consecución de objetivos, los lectores seleccionan y coordinan el uso de diferentes estrategias para alcanzar sus objetivos de lectura. En general, la lectura para fines específicos de una disciplina convoca el empleo de más estrategias cognitivas y metacognitivas que la lectura para fines generales, así como lo demanda la lectura de múltiples textos para la integración de la información (Song et al, 2020), tareas muy frecuentes en el contexto universitario.…”
Section: La Complejidad De Las Estrategias Lectorasunclassified
“…Consequently, a strategic reader would respond actively to the texts by retaining the fundamental and evolving objectives, and this responsiveness influences their reading strategy selection and coordination (Cho, 2014). Further, a comprehensive study evaluation on reading comprehension techniques was conducted by Song et al (2020). They believe there is a significant link between students' reading competency and strategy utilization; English as a second language and English as a foreign language readers may learn to utilize higher-order thinking methods to increase their reading ability.…”
Section: Online Reading Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research in the Indonesian setting (Mudra, 2018), the investigation of online strategies by EFL pre-service teachers has not addressed electronic literacy skills, which is the unique area of online reading strategies. Electronic literacy skills affect the extent to which readers approach the online reading environment (H. R. Park & Kim, 2017;Song et al, 2020). Another major difference between the SLORSI and other online reading strategy questionnaires is that the SLORSI questionnaire is constructed based on three theoretical perspectives: constructively responsive reading, the Information Problem Solving (IPS) model, and new literacies of reading (Li, 2020).…”
Section: Online Reading Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%