2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09736-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive review and a systematic approach to enhance the performance of improved cookstove (ICS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further provide insights into the laboratory-field gap and inform household energy intervention development, we compared the present field-based EFs with the laboratory-based database from Zhang et al (2000), which has been widely used for emission inventory development, clean intervention design, and health and climate impact analyses of residential solid fuels in developing countries. , As shown in Figure , much higher values and larger variations for most fuel–stove combinations in our field study were observed in comparison with those of the laboratory-based database. Taking fuel wood and coal briquettes in metal stoves with flues as examples, the field-based EFs of PM 2.5 presented in the current study were 5.35 ± 5.49 and 6.50 ± 6.48 g/kg, respectively, which were 1.31 and 38.0 times higher in their values and were 2.77 and 5.54 times higher in their relative deviations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To further provide insights into the laboratory-field gap and inform household energy intervention development, we compared the present field-based EFs with the laboratory-based database from Zhang et al (2000), which has been widely used for emission inventory development, clean intervention design, and health and climate impact analyses of residential solid fuels in developing countries. , As shown in Figure , much higher values and larger variations for most fuel–stove combinations in our field study were observed in comparison with those of the laboratory-based database. Taking fuel wood and coal briquettes in metal stoves with flues as examples, the field-based EFs of PM 2.5 presented in the current study were 5.35 ± 5.49 and 6.50 ± 6.48 g/kg, respectively, which were 1.31 and 38.0 times higher in their values and were 2.77 and 5.54 times higher in their relative deviations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Besides environmental risks, these products of combustion pose significant health risks such as lung cancer and acute conditions, hypertension, and premature deaths. Advanced solid fuel cookers aimed at improving combustion were investigated in the studies [28,42,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. Gutierrez, Chica, and Perez [59] parametrically analyzed a gasification-based cooker.…”
Section: Solid Fuel Combustion Cookersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the TLUD type design, solid fuel is put into the burning chamber in batches from the top and formed a charcoal bed, then it is burned, and pyrolysis occurs below it. Air enters through the bottom (primary air) [8,9] and partially oxidizes the solid fuel results in syngas and a secondary air from the top to complete syngas' combustion process. Roth [12] explains that the combustible gas produce moves upward because of the pressure difference between the gasification zone and the combustion zone.…”
Section: Gasifier Cookstovementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A poor cookstove design causing incomplete combustion process, which results in increased carbon monoxide (CO) and harmful particles causing damage to the respiratory system. Current research of briquette cookstoves [9,14,16] focuses on improving its performance and reducing emissions and particulate matter. Briquette cookstove design could vary in every country because of customer's behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%