1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00995120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive patient care system for the family practice

Abstract: Family and Community Health Associates (FACHA) has incorporated an in-house, on-line computerized medical information system into a two-office, three-physician family practice medicine group. A Basic Four System 610 minicomputer is utilized to store all the medical, pharmaceutical, financial, and scheduling records. A SOAP-formated encounter form is used to collect the data. Five medical reports are printed prior to each patient encounter. Evaluations of the use and the benefits of this system are presented. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of a number of articles on the Croatian primary health care information system published in internationally available journals (1,21-23,25-32) and in several other sources (proceedings and reports), this study is the first evaluation of this system from the end-user point of view. Most previous studies pay attention to particular aspects of the health information system, like prevention and management of chronic diseases (5,33), financial expenses (15,34), access time (17), patient point of view (6,35), effect of electronic reminders (36-39), and quality of care, duration of consultation, stress for physicians, and overall problem of using modern technology (16,18). Having in mind that any information system is only as good as the end-users rate it, we decided to start an evaluation based on user satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of a number of articles on the Croatian primary health care information system published in internationally available journals (1,21-23,25-32) and in several other sources (proceedings and reports), this study is the first evaluation of this system from the end-user point of view. Most previous studies pay attention to particular aspects of the health information system, like prevention and management of chronic diseases (5,33), financial expenses (15,34), access time (17), patient point of view (6,35), effect of electronic reminders (36-39), and quality of care, duration of consultation, stress for physicians, and overall problem of using modern technology (16,18). Having in mind that any information system is only as good as the end-users rate it, we decided to start an evaluation based on user satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%