2012
DOI: 10.3233/wor-2012-1039-4218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Literature Review of the Pelvis and the Lower Extremity FE Human Models under Quasi-static Conditions

Abstract: Finite Element Modeling (FEM) has become a vital tool in the automotive design and development processes. FEM of the human body is a technique capable of estimating parameters that are difficult to measure in experimental studies with the human body segments being modeled as complex and dynamic entities. Several studies have been dedicated to attain close-to-real FEMs of the human body (Pankoke and Siefert 2007; Amann, Huschenbeth et al. 2009; ESI 2010). The aim of this paper is to identify and appraise the st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the knee geometries of the subjects were not available, a reference geometry was used. The right lower limb of the Visible Human Project (VHP) [20] was selected as the extended data are free of charge and were used as reference geometry in numerous studies [21, 22]. The anatomical points used to obtain the SCS of both authors' and standardised conventions were identified on the VHP subject geometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the knee geometries of the subjects were not available, a reference geometry was used. The right lower limb of the Visible Human Project (VHP) [20] was selected as the extended data are free of charge and were used as reference geometry in numerous studies [21, 22]. The anatomical points used to obtain the SCS of both authors' and standardised conventions were identified on the VHP subject geometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12, with the lowest score of 3/12 and the highest score of 12/12 (SD ± 2.32). According to Al-Dirini et al, the average CASP score for all the studies indicates an acceptable level of relevance and quality (32). In this review, most of the RCTs (n=12) and cohort studies (n=17) had an acceptable level of relevance and quality.The CASP quality assessment also demonstrated that most of the included RCTs (n=15) didnot have a positive value for the last item of the CASP RCT checklist (the value of the studied intervention compared to the existing interventions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…(29) However, different reviews have used the CASP total scores to assess the quality of included studies. (30)(31)(32) Following the approach used in these studies, each item evaluated was awarded the following qualitative scores: "Yes" (1 point), "No" (0 points), or "Cannot tell" (0 points) to obtain the overall CASP scores.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The units for the PK parameters were standardized for all the studies to keep the data consistent for the comparison of the results. To assess the methodological quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), a modified Jaded scale 21 and the Critical Appraisal Scale Programme (CASP) tool 22 were used in this review. To assess the risk of bias Cochrane collaboration tool for risk bias assessment was used 23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%