No abstract

For preexisting spinal curvature, an anterior spinal growth combined with gravity and a decrease of disc's mechanical stiffness could lead to a progression of scoliosis. Biomechanical factors could be secondary after initial deformation.

The automated patient-specific simulation of CD surgery may improve our understanding of surgical biomechanics. Therefore, it could increase the relevance of preoperative surgery planning.

Biomechanical models have been proposed in order to simulate the surgical correction of spinal deformities. With these models, different surgical correction techniques have been examined: distraction and rod rotation. The purpose of this study was to simulate another surgical correction technique: the in situ contouring technique. In this way, a comprehensive three-dimensional Finite Element (FE) model with patient-specific geometry and patient-specific mechanical properties was used. The simulation of the surgery took into account elasto-plastic behavior of the rod and multiple moments loading and unloading representing the surgical maneuvers. The simulations of two clinical cases of hyperkyphosis and scoliosis were coherent with the surgeon's experience. Moreover, the results of simulation were compared to post-operative 3D measurements. The mean differences were under 5 degrees for vertebral rotations and 5 mm for spinal lines. These simulations open the way for future predictive tools for surgical planning.

The identification of in vivo intervertebral stiffness may improve our understanding of scoliotic spine and the relevance of patient-specific methods for surgical planning.

No abstract

No abstract

As part of the development of new modelling tools for the simulation and design of brace treatment of scoliosis, a finite element model of a brace and its interface with the torso was proposed. The model was adapted to represent one scoliotic adolescent girl treated with a Boston brace. The 3D geometry was acquired using multiview radiographs. The model included the osseo-ligamentous structures, thoracic and abdominal soft tissues, brace foam and shell, and brace-torso interface. The simulations consisted of brace opening to include the patient's trunk followed by brace closing. To validate the model, the resulting geometry was compared with the real in-brace geometry, and the resulting contact reaction forces at the brace-torso interface were compared with the equivalent forces calculated from pressure measurements made on the in-brace patient. Differences between coronal equivalent and reaction forces were less than 7N. However, sagittal reaction forces (47N) were computed on the abdomen, whereas negligible equivalent forces were measured. The simulated geometry presented partially reduced coronal Cobb angles (1-4 degrees), over-corrected sagittal Cobb angles and maximum deformation plane (5 degrees), completely corrected coronal shift, and sagittal shift and rib humps that were not corrected. This study demonstrated the feasibility of a new approach that represents the load transfer from the brace to the spine more realistically than does the direct application of forces.