1985
DOI: 10.1002/net.3230150108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compilation of relations between graph invariants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the 2010 cropping season, national sesame productivity was 8.52 quintals per hectare [3] . This is far less than the Global average which is 22.5 quintals per hectare [10] . Diseases are reported to cause a considerable yield loss elsewhere in the World [4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…During the 2010 cropping season, national sesame productivity was 8.52 quintals per hectare [3] . This is far less than the Global average which is 22.5 quintals per hectare [10] . Diseases are reported to cause a considerable yield loss elsewhere in the World [4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Proof: First part of the inequality follows from Corollary 4.1 and the fact that for any graph G, ω(G) ≤ χ(G). For the other part, we use the following result from [5]:…”
Section: Maximal Cliques In γ(V)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3 may be used with the following result from [3], which relates diameter and domination number, to give the corollary.…”
Section: Domination Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%