2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.07.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A competition between Fujita and Strauss type exponents for blow-up of semi-linear wave equations with scale-invariant damping and mass

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper and in Palmieri, we restrict our consideration to the case in which μ and ν satisfy . However, recently in Palmieri and Reissig, a blow‐up result has been shown for δ ∈ (0,1] for 1<pmaxpFujn+μ12δ2,p0(n+μ), excluding the case p = p 0 ( n + μ ) for n = 1. Consequently, a challenging open problem is to study the necessary part also in the case δ ∈ (0,1), showing that the previous upper bound is actually critical.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper and in Palmieri, we restrict our consideration to the case in which μ and ν satisfy . However, recently in Palmieri and Reissig, a blow‐up result has been shown for δ ∈ (0,1] for 1<pmaxpFujn+μ12δ2,p0(n+μ), excluding the case p = p 0 ( n + μ ) for n = 1. Consequently, a challenging open problem is to study the necessary part also in the case δ ∈ (0,1), showing that the previous upper bound is actually critical.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this paper and in Palmieri, 20 we restrict our consideration to the case in which and satisfy (1.4). However, recently in Palmieri and Reissig, 19 a blow-up result has been shown for ∈ (0, 1] for…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, (1) is "parabolic-like" from the point of view of the critical exponent for "large" δ. On the other hand, in [22] it has been proved a blow-up result for δ ∈ (0, 1] provided that 1 < p max p S (n + µ 1 ), p F n + µ1−1− √ δ 2 with the exception of the critical case p = p S (n + µ 1 ) in dimension n = 1. In the preceding condition p S (r) denotes the so-called Strauss exponent, that is, the positive root of the quadratic equation γ(p, r) := 2 + (r + 1)p − (r − 1)p 2 = 0 for r > 1.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…homogeneous linear equation. According to [3,40,5,4,39,22,30,27,21,13,31,37,38,28,29,6,35,16,20] for δ 0 the model in (2) is somehow an intermediate model between the semilinear free wave equation and the semilinear classical damped equation, whose critical exponent is p Fuj (n + µ−1 2 − √ δ 2 ) for δ ≥ (n + 1) 2 and seems reasonably to be p 0 (n + µ) for small and nonnegative values of delta, where p Fuj (n) and p 0 (n) denote the Fujita exponent and the Strauss exponent, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%