2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifespan of semilinear wave equation with scale invariant dissipation and mass and sub-Strauss power nonlinearity

Abstract: In this paper, we study the blow-up of solutions for semilinear wave equations with scale invariant dissipation and mass in the case in which the model is somehow "wave-like". A Strauss type critical exponent is determined as the upper bound for the exponent in the nonlinearity in the main theorems. Two blow-up results are obtained for the sub-critical case and for the critical case, respectively. In both cases, an upper bound lifespan estimate is given.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these papers, the time -dependent multiplier is bounded by positive constants from above and from below and it is used to study semilinear damped wave models with time -dependent coefficients for the damping terms in the scattering producing case. On the other hand, the case of unbounded time -dependent multipliers is considered for semilinear wave models with scaleinvariant damping and mass terms in [24,22,35,31,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these papers, the time -dependent multiplier is bounded by positive constants from above and from below and it is used to study semilinear damped wave models with time -dependent coefficients for the damping terms in the scattering producing case. On the other hand, the case of unbounded time -dependent multipliers is considered for semilinear wave models with scaleinvariant damping and mass terms in [24,22,35,31,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since for the single equation (1.7) we expect p 0 (n + µ) to be the critical exponent for small and nonnegative values of δ (cf. [37,47,44,45,48]), it is clear that the result from Theorem 2.1 cannot be sharp in this case.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The value of δ has a strong influence on some properties of solutions to (1.7) and to the corresponding homogeneous linear equation. According to [4,57,6,5,56,37,46,43,27,17,47,54,55,44,45,7,48,21,26] for δ 0 the model in (1.7) is somehow an intermediate model between the semilinear free wave equation and the semilinear classical damped equation, whose critical exponent is p Fuj (n + α − 1) for δ ≥ (n + 1) 2 , where α is defined analogously as in (1.3), and seems reasonably to be p 0 (n + µ) for small values of delta. In this paper we will deal with the system (1.1) and we will investigate how the interaction between the powers p, q in the nonlinearities provides either the global in time existence of the solution or the blow-up in finite time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the critical case of blow-up phenomena for semilinear wave equations with scale-invariant damping and mass, it is important to have a precise description of the behavior of solutions to the adjoint equation to the corresponding linear homogeneous equation. According to this purpose, in this section we will introduce a family of self-similar solutions to this equation, that can be represented by using Gauss hypergeometric functions (see also [45,46,12,13,15,35]). In particular, we refer to [35,Section 4] for the proofs of results which are not proved here.…”
Section: Self-similar Solutions Related To Gauss Hypergeometric Functmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…homogeneous linear equation. According to [3,40,5,4,39,22,30,27,21,13,31,37,38,28,29,6,35,16,20] for δ 0 the model in (2) is somehow an intermediate model between the semilinear free wave equation and the semilinear classical damped equation, whose critical exponent is p Fuj (n + µ−1 2 − √ δ 2 ) for δ ≥ (n + 1) 2 and seems reasonably to be p 0 (n + µ) for small and nonnegative values of delta, where p Fuj (n) and p 0 (n) denote the Fujita exponent and the Strauss exponent, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%