2000 IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop. Workshop Record. Held in Conjunction With IEEE Nuclear and Space Radiation Effects C
DOI: 10.1109/redw.2000.896280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compendium of recent optocoupler radiation test data

Abstract: Abstract-Wepresent a compendium of optocoupler radiation test data including neutron, proton and heavy ion Displacement Damage (DD), Single Event Transients (SET) and Total Ionizing Dose (TID).Proton data includes ionizing and non-ionizing damage mechanisms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments with Co-60 gamma rays showed no measureable effect on the optocouplers. It is therefore assumed that the CTR degradation is due to displacement damage in the Light Emitting Diode (LED) [14]. Parametric failure is taken as the point where the CTR degrades to 0.01.…”
Section: B Device Total Dose Failure Distribution G(x)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments with Co-60 gamma rays showed no measureable effect on the optocouplers. It is therefore assumed that the CTR degradation is due to displacement damage in the Light Emitting Diode (LED) [14]. Parametric failure is taken as the point where the CTR degrades to 0.01.…”
Section: B Device Total Dose Failure Distribution G(x)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high resistance of some HCPL optrons (Avago Technologies) is experimentally con firmed. At the same time, the investigations show an unconformity of actual resistance levels of HSSR optocouplers (Avago Technologies) to levels declared in the official documentation [10][11][12][13]. Moreover, the increased sensitivity of optocouplers to defect for ming actions (protons, neutrons) is shown in publica tions.…”
Section: Galvanic Feedback Signal Decoupling Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 (usually with protons as the source [3]): 1) total ionizing dose and 2) nonionizing energy loss (NIEL) [4]. Within the fluence range shown in the figure, neither of these is sufficient to explain the output leakage current variation.…”
Section: A Electrical and Radiation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%