2016
DOI: 10.7567/apex.9.081302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison study: Direct wafer bonding of SiC–SiC by standard surface-activated bonding and modified surface-activated bonding with Si-containing Ar ion beam

Abstract: In this study, the results of direct wafer bonding of SiC–SiC at room temperature by standard surface-activated bonding (SAB) and modified SAB with a Si-containing Ar ion beam were compared, in terms of bonding energy, interface structure and composition, and the effects of rapid thermal annealing (RTA) at 1273 K in Ar gas. Compared with that obtained by the standard SAB, the bonding interface obtained by the modified SAB with a Si-containing Ar ion beam is ∼30% stronger and almost completely recrystallized wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A modified SAB method with a sputtering-deposited Si nano-layer is used to bond the CVD diamond (Samp1) and a modified SAB method with Si-containing Ar ion beam is used to bond the HPHT diamond (Samp2). The detailed bonding process are similar to literature 25,50 . After bonding, the sapphire substrate was removed by a laser lift-off process.…”
Section: Four-phonon Scattering Process Which Is Not Included In the mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A modified SAB method with a sputtering-deposited Si nano-layer is used to bond the CVD diamond (Samp1) and a modified SAB method with Si-containing Ar ion beam is used to bond the HPHT diamond (Samp2). The detailed bonding process are similar to literature 25,50 . After bonding, the sapphire substrate was removed by a laser lift-off process.…”
Section: Four-phonon Scattering Process Which Is Not Included In the mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…At the interface, a bright seamless intermediate layer of about 8 nm should be amorphous because it has no lattice fringes and is distinct from adjacent crystalline phase. From data by previous studies, amorphous layer formation was caused by Ar-FAB bombardment [ 29 , 30 ]. Accordingly, EDX liner mapping of Si, C and O elements distribution of a small sample is shown in Figure 5 b, the analysis location and range are roughly shown as the yellow dotted line in Figure 5 a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a seamless amorphous layer with a thickness of ~15 nm at the bonding interface of SiC-AlN. According to our previous researches [26,27], the surface activation of ion beam bombardment will cause the formation of amorphous layer. Therefore, the amorphous layer may consist of amorphous SiC, amorphous AlN, and deposited Si layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For bonding demonstration, a crystalline AlN film with a thickness of ~100 nm and an RMS surface roughness less than ~0.7 nm was deposited on a SiC wafer by a pulsed direct current magnetron sputtering method at a substrate temperature of 973 K. Both standard SAB and modified SAB with Si nano-layer sputtering deposition were applied to the SiC-AlN bonding at room temperature. Standard SAB failed in the bonding, while the bonding using modified SAB had a bonding energy of ~1.6 J/m 2 , which is strong enough to withstand common mechanical cutting process [27]. The microstructure and composition of the bonding interface were investigated by STEM and EELS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%